Thread by @themarketswork

Awaiting full confirmation but this should have been expected.

If true, it should also make some folks very nervous.

Recall, it was Durham who was investigating Baker for illegal leaking PRIOR to Durham's appointment by Barr to investigate the origins of the Trump investigation

https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1187804071195004928

2) Baker: “I had a jaundiced eye about everything, yes. I had skepticism about all this stuff. I was concerned about all of this. This whole situation was horrible, and it was novel and we were trying to figure out what to do, and it was highly unusual.”
theepochtimes.com/transcripts-of…

3) Baker: There is another occasion that I can think of where somebody brought material to me, based on a preexisting relationship. They gave the material to me. Same situation [as Corn].
theepochtimes.com/baker-testimon…

4) Baker and [David] Corn had multiple conversations regarding “FBI matters”—which Baker would later clarify to mean the Steele dossier—prior to the 2016 presidential election.
theepochtimes.com/baker-testimon…

Baker said in his testimony he believed that Corn had received his copies of the Steele memos from Glenn Simpson, the head of Fusion GPS:

James Baker had previously said he was cooperating with IG Horowitz.

He said he was open to cooperating w/Durham.

But it had not been confirmed that he was doing so.

This is why I said "this should have been expected."

https://twitter.com/lynseyross999/status/1187814529725583365

The FBI, with no actual evidence of collusion after 10 months of investigating, began discussing a complete hypothetical at the highest levels of leadership as a means to possibly open an obstruction-of-justice investigation of the president of the United States.