, 10 tweets, 4 min read
My Authors
Read all threads
1. So, a friend on @Facebook pinged me with this ad she saw there for a talcum powder lawsuit scheme and said, "isn't that Krissy?" And indeed, it is -- and the picture strongly implies that she's holding a settlement check.

This is not true, and also, the photo was stolen. Krissy, holding a check.
2. The picture, which I took, is actually Krissy holding up our last mortgage check. I wrote a piece about that moment here:

whatever.scalzi.com/2015/09/18/why…

The check is going out, not coming in. Krissy's happy because we paid off the mortgage, not because she's gotten a settlement. The picture as it appears on my site, in 2015.
3. Also for the record, Krissy is not now nor has even been a party to a suit regarding baby/talcum powder.
4. So how did Krissy's picture end up on this ad? On a hunch, I typed "Woman Holding Check" into Google Image Search, and well, there she was. Not right at the top, but not that far down the page, either. The dumbass making the ad probably made a similar search. Excerpt from the google search of
5. Now, obviously by this point, neither I nor Krissy consented to the use of this photo in this ad. Nor is this photo public domain, under Creative Commons, or legally licensed. I took it and retain the copyright to it. Its use is, flat out, unauthorized and illegal.
6. (This use is also definitely not covered under "fair use.")
7. Leaving aside any strictly legal issues regarding the photo's use, there are the issues that a) Krissy appears to be endorsing the site the ad links to, b) people who know Krissy might assume the settlement check means she is/was ill, specifically with cancer (she's not).
8. The person bringing the ad to my attention is a friend of Krissy's and I had to assure her that Krissy wasn't part of a suit (with everything that implies). It seems careless and cruel on the part of the ad maker to use that photo and to make people actually worry.
9. I also can't imagine an ad using unauthorized and illegally obtained photos for commercial purposes actually conforms to @facebook's advertising policies. It would be nice for the service to have better intake protocols to keep this from happening in the future.
10. tl;dr:

a) A picture of Krissy I took was used in a @facebook baby powder lawsuit ad;

b) Neither of us consented to its use;

c) Krissy was not party to a suit/settlement and is physically fine;

d) The ad maker/people using the ad are scum;

e) @facebook, do better.

/end
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh.

Enjoying this thread?

Keep Current with John Scalzi

Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!