Switzerland: can we have 1 or 2 minutes to look at decision?
(Pres consults)
Pres: (directs to a Dropbox I think)
Invites adoption of Chile Madrid Time For Action
Suspends meeting of CMA
Opens COP25 plenary
Pres: noted
Brazil: having tech difficulties and getting a little lost - can you confirm which draft decision you’re referring to? Isn’t L10 the one?
Pres: its L6
Egypt: my copy of L6 relates to finance
Pres: you’re right, L10
Malaysia: raise process issue. Needs to be inclusive and transparent. All parties need net/doc access.
Spain: we echo what Indonesia has said. Strong messages from IPCC. Retain.
Costa Rica for AILAC: support Indonesia and Spain. Strongly support the science mentions
Brazil: have listened carefully, understand interests, but think these para undermine balance. Would like to preserve rest. Insist on partial accommodation.
Pres: given importance of this para to the other parties, appreciate if you let us adopt and note your concern.
Adopted
Pres: OK
(The website docs page is not working and we are being redirected to a Dropbox. Hence confusion.)
Brazil: again a request for technical assistance - clarify what doc and subject matter.
Pres: FCCC/CP/2029/L.9 - scope of next periodic review of long term global goal and overall progress
<the article 6 text has the same L-number, hence confusion.>
Item 2b - rules of procedure - consultations found no change in positions and consultations will continue at COP26. Propose continuing draft rules of procedure except draft rule 42. Decided.
Egypt: on previous item, highlight concern about lack of agreement of report on CGE (sp?)
Pres: notes.
officers nominated.
Invites election of (many names).
SBSTA chair of Congo; SBI chair of Norway.
Decided
Hearing none, decided.
Invites decision KP/CMP/2029/L.5. Chile Madrid Time For Action.
Decided.
More needed to enter into force. Invite KP parties to submit instruments ASAP.
Decided
Item 14 - other matters?
None raised. Decided.
Open CMA 2 (again): invite item 5 - public registries - 5a Art 4 registry - contact group did not complete work. Sent onward to next meeting. Decided
Switzerland: deep disappointment we couldn’t complete an adaptation Registry. Concerned that some parties who argue for adaptation aren’t ready to allow reg!
Egypt: be clear this decision doesn’t prejudge discussion underway on governance. Not done deal. Discussion continues.
Expect decision on L.12 to be adopted / they’re a package.
And par 38 - L&D finance goes beyond adaptation.
Egypt: we can’t access the document - need tech support or capacity building (laughs)
Pres: if you refresh maybe... no?
Egypt: even with capacity building and technical support from Norway I was unable to access. I pressed refresh, which is a capacity I have, but it didn’t work.
<Pres sends Secretariat support>
(Number found)
Egypt: I will have comments on doc when you are finished.
Egypt: before adoption, highlight that African group lost several elements and priorities important to us. Progrsm of work, target relevant countries and regions, improve focus on adaptation. Our concerns are cross cutting.
Pres: on record.
Adaptation fund is important to whole LATAM region. Share@l of proceeds from both 6.2 and 6.4 is of utmost importance to us.
Disappointing we couldn’t agree Art 6.
Market mechanisms are a crucial element of PA architecture.
Put lots@of@energy into getting positive result here. Frustrating we couldn’t conclude.
Fully support Egypt re importance of adaptation funding; crucial to ensure more adequate funding, support mandatory SOP in 6.2
Our interpretation is that use of these docs will refer to levels of maturity.
Art 6 is important but absence of rules doesn’t prevent function of PA, markets, linkage.
Market mechanisms can help accelerate our global mitigation efforts like we need to. But rules must be robust and with integrity.
Had we agreed last version we would have robust funding for adapt
Thanks to secretariat team for all their work.
We’ll continue to be constructive.
Tuvalu hopes we can return language that protects human rights and rights of indigenous.
Thanks to SA and NZ ministers. I hope we can use this material to get final agreement at COP26.
Decided with footnote reading all texts.
Urges taking note of CMA decision on WIM.
Palestine for G77: reiterates earlier sentiments on governance.
Pres: noted
Egypt: we’re seeing two different documents.
Pres: current file is the right one.
Pres: (RRO reads latest Dropbox version)
Egypt: that’s not the text we discussed overnight- doesn’t refer to importance of continuing discussion. Can we go back to that language.
Pres: we’ll come back to you.
Japan contests contestation
Pres: give me a minute
Egypt: disappointing. Unfortunate. Can’t affirm importance of climate finance. Don’t know what to say. We fully ratified PA and are not backsliding but not all are doing the same.
Not here for nice words but to work.
Argentina: need enhanced ambition in finance. For our group we are disappointed.
Rec L2. Decided.
COP adjourned
Open. CMP
Clearly sad not to have reached final agreement. So very close. On the verge.
That’s one item.
We agreed on gender. We grew the Climate Ambition Coalition. We discussed oceans and science-based initiatives.
But it’s not enough. We need more ambition and solutions. What we have is not enough to address the crisis before us.
I call on the world to accelerate political will and meet the task. The young are calling
NGOs (including BINGO) object.
Brazil: propose at least other Parties send statements in writing
(Cheering from NGOs)
EU: (brief, support Egypt)
Gender important. Look forward to COP26.
Disappointed at finance outcome.
BASIC has already put forward contributions for future and development.
You can’t negotiate with nature
The colonial project has embedded patriarchy, ableism, homophobia
We have solutions.
I Declare CMP15 closed
I declare CMA2 closed
(Stands. ITS OVER!)