@Michael_Zank Hi, I read your article and am very confused.
You say the EO "does not distinguish between legitimate and illegitimate criticism of Israel" while IHRA does. This omission "opens the door to civil rights proceedings" against universities for anti-Israel activities. 1/
You say the EO "does not distinguish between legitimate and illegitimate criticism of Israel" while IHRA does. This omission "opens the door to civil rights proceedings" against universities for anti-Israel activities. 1/
@Michael_Zank But the EO doesn't even mention the word "Israel." Its only reference to Israel is via the IHRA definition which already has what you are asking for,
Am I missing something?
Am I missing something?
@Michael_Zank The more I look at the article the less it makes sense.
Do you think the existing Title VI language fights white supremacism, since it provides protection against racism?
From the other perspective, do you disagree that IHRA covers white supremacist antisemitism?
Do you think the existing Title VI language fights white supremacism, since it provides protection against racism?
From the other perspective, do you disagree that IHRA covers white supremacist antisemitism?
@Michael_Zank And what on Earth does an EO on Title VI have to do with law enforcement?
I hope you answer, because I plan on writing a piece on this article and I'd love your responses. I'm hoping that you, as an academic, can defend your words.
I hope you answer, because I plan on writing a piece on this article and I'd love your responses. I'm hoping that you, as an academic, can defend your words.
