Maybe the dumbest thing in all US politics is the way liberals tend to cheer for regime change in Syria while conservatives tend to support regime change in Iran. In reality it's the same agenda: they're just arguing over which government to oust first. Amazing propaganda trick.
Supporting regime change in Iran but not Syria, or vice versa, is like enthusiastically supporting shooting a man in the head but vehemently objecting to shooting him the heart.
Whenever I'm writing against US regime change in Syria it's a guarantee I'll spend the day arguing with liberals. Whenever I'm writing against US regime change in Iran it's guaranteed I'll spend it arguing with conservatives. Always. Every single time.
It's an absolute certainty that this dynamic has been planned out in discussions about "perception management" in US government agencies. America's two mainstream factions arguing over which regime change intervention to support didn't happen organically.
