In the order mentioned in the article, BP comes first.
BP's upstream oil and gas activity will have increased 5 percent annually between 2016-2021
It is spending $71bn this decade on upstream oil and gas projects
ogj.com/general-intere…
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EN6cJsIX4AEwNqK.jpg)
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EN6cJsOW4AAcmw-.jpg)
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EN6dgkdWAAEojKO.jpg)
Its green investment has totalled less than $2bn in the last five years (1/3rd of its own stated target)
globaldata.com/shell-leads-gl…
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EN6eNYkXUAAQy8r.png)
Instead they're all expanding ctvnews.ca/sci-tech/energ…
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EN6g9BEWoAASy52.jpg)
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EN6hh_FXsAI2xik.jpg)
The economy has changed. The economics of green beats that of brown
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EN6iSxOW4AAX07I.png)
"Eliminating subsidies would have reduced global carbon emissions in 2013 by 21% and fossil fuel air pollution deaths 55%, while raising revenue of 4%, and social welfare by 2.2%, of global GDP"
- #Fossilfuels subsidies contributed 21% to global GHG emissions
- Caused 55% of global air pollution deaths
- Cost 4% of global GDP
sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EN_pniPXsAAwapP.png)
Well here's $5 trillion a year for you. Will that maybe grease the wheels a little? #ClimateEmergency
They then lock the world in to hydrocarbons for decades that are only going concerns due to the dollars and deaths of taxpayers worldwide