Thread by @Raj63245195

@ZeeMohamed_ @Freedom_Gazette I'm really shocked that this guy was a Former adviser to @IndiaUNNewYork !

Personal interest in evaluating a law which is very much constitutional!

Tell me dude, if you're against CAA, you must be against religion based minority benefits in India right?

Are you?

@ZeeMohamed_ @Freedom_Gazette @IndiaUNNewYork Let's have a discussion about the constitutional & moral validity of CAA. I hope you won't block me as that's my experience with most of the anti CAA ppl!

@ZeeMohamed_ @Freedom_Gazette @IndiaUNNewYork BTW I take back that "I'm shocked part" as you clarified that you're against religion based minority benefits that existed/existing in India. Then your stand is consistent, you've a moral authority to say that. Still, I won't agree with your stand against CAA as it's not just..

@ZeeMohamed_ @Freedom_Gazette @IndiaUNNewYork India not accepting all, it's about the past experiences of India. Policies can't be implemented without looking at realities & if u do, you're inviting further trouble which you experienced several times in the past. Not all highly secular laws r highly rational!

@ZeeMohamed_ @Freedom_Gazette @IndiaUNNewYork I'm an atheist& I don't want a Muslim majority anywhere in India. It's not because I hate Muslims, it's because I know that religion so well& I know what'll happen to the modern man made constitutions if Islam become majority anywhere. There's a huge conflict between the core of

@ZeeMohamed_ @Freedom_Gazette @IndiaUNNewYork Islam, ie, Sharia & Modern man made constitutions. The same conflict exists between Muslims& Modern constitutions. Sharia is not just a personal law, it's a law for the land where Muslims r living. Which means, the moment Muslims become majority, they're religiously obliged to..

@ZeeMohamed_ @Freedom_Gazette @IndiaUNNewYork implement sharia, even if not 100% as 100% Sharia is very hard to implement these days, that's why we say ISIS r animals. They're implementing purest form of Sharia

I don't see any such direct conflict between Hinduism&modern constitutions as both of them can coexist. That's the

@ZeeMohamed_ @Freedom_Gazette @IndiaUNNewYork only reason why India continued as a democracy&Indian constitution is still surviving. If it was Muslim majority, no doubt, Ambedkar's constitution would be long gone by now!

I repeat, I don't want Muslim majority anywhere in India, that's not because I hate Muslims, the people,

@ZeeMohamed_ @Freedom_Gazette @IndiaUNNewYork but because I clearly know the end result of such a majority.

So I prefer the less problematic one, Hindus, the only section which can keep the equilibrium.

And look around the world. For Muslims, it's best for them when they're living in a Muslim minority democracy! Isn't..

@ZeeMohamed_ @Freedom_Gazette @IndiaUNNewYork that the same thing you all are saying in another way, by asking to take ahammadiyyas etc to India, from Muslim majority nations?

Yes it is.

Let me conclude with something funny. The same people who were accusing that there's Muslim persecution in India until recently,

@ZeeMohamed_ @Freedom_Gazette @IndiaUNNewYork the same people are now asking more Muslims to be taken to India, the same India which these people claimed "Muslim persecution country"

Why? So that they too can be persecuted here?

This exposes the "Muslim persecution in India" accusations!

Thank you

@ZeeMohamed_ @Freedom_Gazette @IndiaUNNewYork NB: What I said above, about the conflict between Islam & modern constitutions, u can see a sample here. This is not random or cherry picking, this is the display of a very serious conflict between Islam& modern democracies



U cant see such a thing among

@ZeeMohamed_ @Freedom_Gazette @IndiaUNNewYork Hindus, even among RSS. Bcz there's no such a religious law - Modern Constitution conflict in Hinduism. For that reason, I'm sure Indian constitution will survive under Hindus, even RSS. Having Sharia as the law of the land is not a wish in Islam &Muslims, it's a necessity that..

@ZeeMohamed_ @Freedom_Gazette @IndiaUNNewYork Muslims r obliged to fulfill once they're majority. So the threat to modern constitutions are very much real & we can see& predict it logically. All u need to do to see that is, learn Islam! I did so I'm aware of it!

@ZeeMohamed_ @Freedom_Gazette @IndiaUNNewYork If anybody is wondering how you can say this with that much confidence, here's the thing

Sharia is the core of Islam, the constitution for mankind allah gave through Muhammad, the messenger of god, according to Islam

So, a true Muslim can never choose a man made constitution..

@ZeeMohamed_ @Freedom_Gazette @IndiaUNNewYork above sharia. They're allowed to live under man made constitution, but there's a catch. Only when Muslims r minority in a place and they don't have the power to establish sharia.. Once this situation changes, once Muslims become majority, there's no choice between Sharia& modern

@ZeeMohamed_ @Freedom_Gazette @IndiaUNNewYork constitutions... Sharia based constitution is a must do, because if they dont, that's same as saying a man made constitution is better than Allah's law 4 humanity. This is like saying Allah's law is inferior& man made laws are superior. Which simply means, god is inferior& human

@ZeeMohamed_ @Freedom_Gazette @IndiaUNNewYork beings are superior. This is impossible for a Muslim to do. If somebody do it, that simply means, they're not Muslims, even if they've a Muslim name.

This is a conflict between Islam & modern laws which can't be repaired. It's simply not possible!