OK now you have the rules, you can discard anything the 3s and 4s. say. Keep the 4s for amusing anecdotes if you want.
Then you have to separate the rest into 1s (R) and 2s (D) and simply reverse of find the omissions.
Let me demonstrate.
"Arguments"
Huawei is an extension of China and so a risk to UK security. Huawei should immediately be restricted and all tech removed by 2022.
The UK will isolate itself from other Nations if it works with Huawei (this LOL notion from brexiters is from a 1 not a 4)
Huawei is of no threat to UK we have them contained (R) but it pisses Trump off and we have enough trouble with a shit US trade deal not delivering any upside (D).
We need that deal in force by 2023, it'll be bad but we'll sell uplands for 2024 GE (D)
There's no risk of isolation, idiot, we'd be the guys pushjg for that (R)! But the EU is pursuing Huawei Tech and that might make us less isolated from them. And we don't want that impossible to explain even for a Patsy embarrassment. (D)
Plus we've all got huge direct or indirect backhanders or benefits in kind, eg tropical holidays, and we don't want our legs broken if we drop this now (All but led by D).
...END TRANSLATE...
With minor adjustments our algorithm translates the biased reporting of the 75% of our Press owned in Offshore Tax havens, & dictated by Billionaires.
#WhataFreePressWouldSay is a rolling feed in dev, with side by side translations against original Propaganada.
Soon we'll detoxify in real-time, an app will displace Press sites with same content MINUS
Bias
Fakery
Deliberate omissions
Editorial interference
This effort needs volunteers. It'll be a democratic shot in the arm
If you can give time to
#WhataFreePressWouldSay pls DM