My Authors
Read all threads
(1/) The @imperialcollege study by @MRC_Outbreak on #COVID19 is incredibly important. You should read it. How do their approaches and conclusions for the US compare to mine? tl;dr: they are very similar. More detail in the thread.
(2/) Comparing charts for overall deaths from their model and mine, you'll see that the Imperial College model finds that we stop adding significant numbers to the death count by mid July. My model puts that around June. Total Deaths - IC: 2.2M, My forecast: 1.2M
(3/) Without govt intervention: The IC study finds US cases peak in mid-May. My model peaks in late April.
(4/) Without govt intervention: The IC study expects 80% of the US to become infected. My model forecasts >95%.
(5/) The parameters of the models are very similar as well: The IC study uses a hospitalization rate of 4.4%. My model uses ~9%. For R0 and the serial interval, IC uses 2.4 and 5 days. I use 2.3 and 4.7 days, respectively.
(6/) Both models make similar adjustments for asymptomatic case rates, but the IC model takes a more sophisticated approach by reducing the asymptomatic transmission rate by 1/3.
(7/) These are two VERY different models and policymakers should be paying attention to the fact that they come to the same conclusions. In #forecasting, when very different models prepared by independent teams come to the same conclusion, our confidence in those conclusions rise
(8/) The IC #COVID19 study uses an agent-based modeling system that is very similar (but far more complex) to the one represented in this Washington Post viz. washingtonpost.com/graphics/2020/…
(9/) My model uses a classic SIR model described in further detail in my original medium post. As opposed to model the behavior of each person in the country, the classic model uses three populations: Susceptible, Infected, and Recovered (+deaths) medium.com/@donnellymjd/n…
(10/) In the #SIR #COVID19 model, we estimate the # of people who go from being healthy to infected (S➡I) and # of people who go from being infected to recovered/dead (I➡R) on each day. The first rate is given by the R0 and serial interval. The second is 1/days to recovery.
(11/) What does this mean for the IC study's findings? As far as I'm concerned, I'm both impressed and convinced. They go about 10 steps beyond my approach and estimate the effects of policy responses. Policymakers should listen to their conclusions.
(12/) We will need overall population-wide social distancing in the short term to get #COVID19 under control in our countries. Then we need periodic releases and reimpositions of controls based on careful monitoring of ICU load/capacity. Continuing for 18 months or more.
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh.

Enjoying this thread?

Keep Current with Michael Donnelly

Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!