1- It's a preprint on medRxiv - this means it has yet to be evaluated by the medical community and the information presented may be erroneous (read with a shaker of salt nearby)
medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
3- Randomized, double-blinded trial (nice!)
5- Patients could not have severe/critical #Covid_19 infection; avg age was ~45y.o., even split M/F.
7- Main outcomes: Time to Clinical Recovery (TTCR, mainly improvement in fevers and/or cough) & chest CT changes from Day 1 to Day 6
8- Results: 62 pts in trial
10- 81% of HCQ+std tx group had improved pneumonia (on CT scan) vs. 55% of std tx....this was NOT
11- No pts who received #hydroxycholoroquine progressed to severe illness vs. 4/31 of std tx...not stat significant, though approaching it (P=0.11 by my Fisher's exact test)
1- No mention of a pre-study primary outcome, no mention of calc. a proper sample size based on a primary outcome.
2- TTCR was defined as "return of [normal] body temp & cough relief for >72h. But they only mention checking these data for the 6d tx period?
4- I was a little skeptical of the "statistical significance of the ~1day shorter TTCRs for #Hydroxychloroquine so...
#COVID19 #Hydroxychloroquine
All things considered, a decent clinical study. It provides some evidence to support potential benefit in patients with non-severe #COVID19 infection. Have to start somewhere.