I appreciate the interest and understand the controversies that some colleagues raised in regards to my piece. Let me clarify a few things
mei.edu/blog/its-not-a…
(1) has to do with the sourcing of the reports that sparked the whole issue;
(2) has to do with the very nature of this discourse in Russia.
I’m not saying it’s propaganda or fake news, but people initially relied on twisted interpretation of the materials published in Russia which eventually drew them to wrong conclusions.
(a) lesser of other evils / the devil you knew
(b) safer bet than picking which of the 50 shades of opposition to support
(c) he had control of army (broken, demoralized but still a force that could be trained and fight on the ground)..
(e) he was - and remains - legitimate president.Even thou he morally delegitimized himself by violent crackdowns and other crimes,his diplomats still sitting in foreign missions and at the UN.