#capitalism and capitalists' fortunes are built on this practice. all the free-flowing #business and #finance propaganda, churned out in huge volumes for the edification of persons who've devoted themselves to #money, talks about _investing_.
the great bulk of money made in #capitalism goes only to the ownership class; the toilers below them get pennies. those unable to toil get *less* than nothing—capitalism wants such people to be liquidated, hence @charlesmurray and @EPoe187 cook up rationales for doing so.
(2/x)
ultimately this is *why* #eugenics and "scientific racism" exists at all: #capitalism needs some pseudointellectual justification for marginalizing and liquidating all human beings who are unable or *unwilling* to toil for capitalism. this is WHY @Quillette is well-funded.
(3/x)
if you're *not* a toiler (or outcast) in #capitalism then you're making your money through what the euphemistic #business and #finance propaganda has learned to call "passive income", i.e. money made on the backs of someone else's work.
the capitalist merely *collects*.
(4/x)
#capitalism makes this possible because it separates the ownership and financing of industries completely from the *operation* of the industries. a corporate steel-mill or grocery store, for example, is owned and financed by people who may never even see it personally.
(5/x)
these people regard the steel-mill and the grocery store—and literally every other entity in the capitalist #economy—merely in terms of monetary flow and #investment. they put #money into these things, and they *demand* that more money flows out, with clockwork regularity.
(6/x)
if they *don't* get the expected "return on #investment" (#ROI) on the dot, the capitalists all panic and speculative investors fall away and the #management starts ordering a lot of people to be fired and all that. they make decisions solely on the basis of #money flow.
(7/x)
viewing *all industry* simply as an elaborate machine that magically always outputs more #money than you put into it—the #finance equivalent of a perpetual motion machine—is a form of *abstraction*. it's turning something real (e.g. the factory) into something virtual.
the corporate #management and #executive people, already almost completely dissociated from the actual operations and working conditions of the industries they run (because they think of everything as mere money flow), find #programming abstractions to be *congenial*.
(10/x)
the #computer simulation gives the illusion of reality to their abstractions about #money and #industry, and there's plenty of starry-eyed nerds around (especially in the @elonmusk / @mtaibbi set) who already are used to pretending that computer simulations are reality.
(11/x)
the superficial and avaricious #computerscience / #programming culture that's flourished in the last couple of decades has inflamed the sicknesses of #capitalism to the point of lethality: #business owners now think that computers are magic, universal problem-solvers.
but let's get back to the #investment itself, which is a transaction that has *nothing to do* with the average worker. even in high #technology these days, few workers are "vested".
(13/x)
#investment is really a transaction between two persons: someone who owns a business, and someone who hopes to get rich off that business without having any connection to it other than #investing. the #investor wants a magical thing: a pile of money that always grows.
(14/x)
and the *business owner* wants something equally facile: they want to be able to write themselves massive paychecks straight from the flow of venture capital into their bank accounts. the more #investment flows in, the bigger the #executive paychecks can get.
(15/x)
in other words, most #investment money flows straight into rich owners' pockets, through various direct and indirect ways. the #investor doesn't care about whether their investment money truly goes towards operating the business—they don't even care how the business runs.
(16/x)
the #investor sees the success of a #business merely in terms of whether they get money back from it—whether they have a good #ROI. they're not connected to the business itself in any way; they don't even need to know the least thing about it, other than its cash flow.
(17/x)
and yet it's the decisions of these *completely detached and ignorant people*, the #investment crowd who lives only for the collection of "passive income" that they never worked for, that end up controlling #industry and #innovation in #capitalism. it's unhinged.
(18/x)
the people who've made big heaps from this purely *passive* activity of raking in money from businesses they don't know the tiniest thing about—@pmarca, @saylor, @jason, @BillyM2k, even @elonmusk—are shallow, superficial, *stupid* men—and they control the #economy.
one more rumination for tonight, I think. this one is about something that's been called "contrarianism"—a word that's been coined in some attempt to describe the perplexing behavior of celebrity 'influencers', specially the more toxic ones like @mtaibbi and @mattyglesias.
(1/x)
but the behavior is probably quite general. just about *all* of the #journalist and #media figures who have some privileged access to the press and to mass audience have learned to behave in this way on @Twitter and social media: they run away from challenging questions.
(2/x)
the blue-checked "influencers" of the @LPDonovan / @StevenTDennis / @JakeSherman sort (I've picked three names almost at random) are the people who have *benefited the most* from the #Internet-ization of #journalism. social media has amplified their social privilege.
the noisemakers at all levels of the #conservative noise machine, from the august @AEI propagandists (like "race scientist" @charlesmurray) to circus sideshows like @Timcast, try to blame "woke", but...
(1/x)
that "woke" game is extremely thin by now. really it's just rebranded Red Scare nonsense. in 1950, it was Commies who were "destroying our youth" with virulent ideas that right-wing ideologues didn't like, like abstract algebra; now @mtracey and @DouthatNYT blame "woke".
(2/x)
but ask any low-level right-wing expert on "woke"—ask @realchrisrufo or @ConceptualJames what "wokeism" actually *is*—and you'll get the word "Marxism" in no time: "woke" is, in other words, nothing new at all. it's the same old paranoia about pinko Rooskies in closets.
#capitalism requires what people call "magical thinking". it requires people to believe that impossible things aren't merely *possible*, but can be done routinely, and turned into a dependable cash flow. #AI / #AGI of the @fchollet / @JeffDean sort is a perfect example.
the very name "#AGI" gives the game away: the #programming boys daydream that they've invented a "general intelligence", a universal thinking machine capable of solving literally any problem—and #capitalism is willing to gamble on that. it's just what #business wants.
(2/x)
remember that the ideal corporation in #capitalism *does nothing*. it produces nothing, it provides no service, it solves no problems for anyone not in the ownership hierarchy—because producing things *costs money* and capitalists hate all expenditures for any reason.
more #cryptocurrency talk. it seems that there may be (another) #cryptocrash developing; there's been so many of them.
to reiterate my earlier point: the allure of #cryptocurrencies is instant #money in vast volumes, and that's why $BITC and @ETH have a million copycats.
#cryptocurrency (and the related #blockchain money-making gewgaw, the #NFT) are in a sense nothing new. there have been untold millions of #investment scams and #business tricks and other shifty clever ways that at least *pretend* they can guarantee an effortless #profit.
(2/x)
this is an artifact of the extreme #wealth inequality encouraged by #capitalism: once you've got a bunch of elite capitalists *hoarding* all the #money, that means you've got big enough piles to *steal*. all get-rich-quick schemes are ultimately acts of disguised _theft_.
the central lie is that "the markets" (i.e. the sum total of all monetary transactions by all money-seeking entities in #capitalism) are the best possible mechanism for fulfilling every conceivable human need.
if it's not "on the market", then you don't really need it.
I am not a #Christian; my friend Chara (who writes at @KrisAtLarge) is Catholic—albeit a heretical one—but I am no "believer". as I've said, I tend to leave religion to others.
all the same, it's tough *not* to have opinions about #Christianity—we're inundated with it.
(1/x)
in the United States especially, right-wing politics—which infallibly promotes an extremist and hyperpoliticized form of #Christianity—pours enormous effort and money into publicizing #Christian political demands.
@GOP politics and Bible-bashing are practically the same.
(2/x)
in fact, it seems like *all* public spokespersons for Christianity in the U.S. are political figures. #Christian@GOP politicians and activists and corporate executives proudly proclaim their purpose in public office to be the promotion of "Jesus" and "faith" and "values".