(1) Before I write below about medical issues & the Presidency, please note why I argue it matters:
9/11/01 showed me who our No.1 enemy is.
9/11/12 showed me the Democrat party is wedded to that enemy.
9/11/16 showed me the MSM is the PR wing of that party & the enemy.
9/11/01 showed me who our No.1 enemy is.
9/11/12 showed me the Democrat party is wedded to that enemy.
9/11/16 showed me the MSM is the PR wing of that party & the enemy.
(2) For details supporting my arguments in this thread about all three 9/11s, read Field of Fight by @GenFlynn and Gander by @debradelai.
(3) 9/11/01 showed me our (US & allies) No.1 enemy is the decades-old socialist-jihadist partnership between political parties and groups (incl but not limited to, Al Qaeda). Not Islam per se. Specific people.
(4) IDC what name socialist-jihadists are using this week. I define them by their actions in funding, co-ordinating, inspiring, training and carrying out terrorism & other violence against innocents, anywhere.
(5) The Flynn & Montes-Bradley books outline how & why Middle Eastern socialists became "jihadists" & what that looks like today.
(6) 9/11/12 showed me the Democratic party is wedded to jihadism. Obama made an active choice not to order readily available rescue teams to Benghazi.
(7) Regardless of any other facts or theories about Benghazi, one thing is clear: A POTUS has the sworn duty to order rescue teams in such a situation. There was ample time.
(8) Even if the rescue had failed, Obama at least would have been able to show that he did his duty. The Democrat party is wedded to our enemy.
(9) 9/11/16 showed me the MSM is the PR wing of the Democrat party & the enemy. The party-enemy needed to win the 2016 Presidential election at all costs. So it lied that day.
(10) By June 2016 the previous comments about and on-the-record physical signs of as-yet unknown serious illness(es) in Hillary Clinton had sparked considerable public discussion.
(11) In the ensuing months, yet more physical signs were recorded, and more media lies were told.
(12) On 9/11/16 HRC's press pool were told not to follow her as she moved from the venue to her van. They obliged. A member of the public took a video, though.
(13) When analyzed frame by frame & as a whole, the video provides ample information for an honest, experienced doctor to deduce what kind of medical episode she did not have & likely did have.
(14) For example, she didn't faint, because her head and neck were held rigid, instead of falling forward or back.
(15) The MSM accepted uncritically her claim that she collapsed due to overheating, then pneumonia. They showed us they are wedded to the Democrat party & our enemy.
(16) Honest, experienced doctors who no longer fear the career consequences of speaking out, have suggested what they believe is the most likely cause of her collapse that day.
(17) Based on all the publicly available evidence over many years, they suggest Levodopa Induced Dyskinesia of Parkinsons Disease (LID-PD) or something close to it caused the signs and symptoms.
(18) The implications of a condition like LID-PD on mental fitness for office are massive. That aside, the incident showed us what the MSM do.
(19) Which brings me to this week's controversies about the routine Presidential physical exam & the media coverage of it.
(20) There is no real need for the media to lie about this routine exam. But they will, and already have, because (read the whole thread).
(21) An effective journalism community would report the facts honestly, with an appropriate level of critique, and with courtesy toward consumers and subjects.
(22) I'll show you just one example that illustrates my point beautifully. If you'd like to read about several additional examples, you can read an earlier thread of mine here:
(23) The President's physical was completed on Friday afternoon, 1/12/18. The WH statement (6.55pm EST) was: 
(24) Further WH statements are to be made on Tuesday 1/16/18 by Dr Jackson himself, in the WH press briefing, with media questions answered.
(25) On Friday evening MSNBC's Rachel Maddow included a short piece on the subject:
(26) Here is the email to which Maddow referred: 
(27) Maddow claimed the statement was made by the WH, ie "the WH misspelled Dr Jackson's first name." She then gave her opinion on what the error meant.
(28) The email clearly states that Anne Gearen sent it. She is a Washington post reporter. So the spelling mistake was hers, not the WH's.
(29) We already saw that the WH @PressSec spelled the name correctly in her tweet.
(30) Some will opine that the WaPo reporter deliberately spelled his name wrong, to fuel an attack narrative. Such actions have occurred recently at a high rate.
(31) Whether the mistake was accidental or not, Maddow clearly lied about the origin of the email, and added her highly negative opinions about the WH and the President.
(32) Twitter trolls then used the false claim to attack the WH, claiming the statement was not made by Dr Jackson & the President is not in excellent health.
(33) It's starting to read like dozens of other instances, isn't it?
(34) I wanted to lay it out in a thread for readers instead of making isolated tweets all over the place this week. IMO, the context, going back decades, is important.
(35) If you see outlandish predictions and claims about Dr Jackson's statements this week, please send me a link. I enjoy refuting them. If you want to DM, just ask.
(36) I'm thankful that this great President is in excellent health, that he won the election, that he's going nowhere & that we're winning against our enemies again. #MAGA
(37) And I'm especially thankful to @GenFlynn for his service, & for writing his book. I and thousands of other supporters of Lt Gen Flynn look forward to his inevitable exoneration. We need him fully back in the Field of Fight.
END
END
