Since this tweet made no sense, I'll clarify. Let's think about a bell curve/normal distribution of possible end results to the Mueller investigation about What Happened between Trump and Russia.
over to the left of the bell curve you have the most miminal amount wrongdoing, which is basically what we know so far.
Moving to the middle: people associated w the campaign worked w Russian intermediaries in some fashion, perhaps somewhat glacingly or just a few key moments
Moving to the middle: people associated w the campaign worked w Russian intermediaries in some fashion, perhaps somewhat glacingly or just a few key moments
and then out there on the right, the tail end, most extreme part of this distribution: that basically the President of the US signed onto a quid pro quo with a foreign adversary to engage in a criminal conspiracy to infiltrate and sabotage and American election.
For a very long time I have thought that that final possibility, the "tail end" was *extremely unlikely*. But as time goes on, and evidence comes in, it's likeliness seems to increase to me.
And I think very few people are prepared to reckon with what it would mean if it were to turn out to be true.
