Follow the timeline...."Only a few hours after the New York office of the FBI took possession of the Weiner laptop, on September 26, 2016, the FBI computer expert discovered it contained more than 140,000 emails involving Hillary Clinton."
"according to the inspector general, 39 high-ranking FBI agents knew of it, along with the New York office and people in the New York U.S. Attorney’s office. The New York FBI informed them all during a secure video-conference on September 28 "
So SDNY knew of this on September 28, 2016. Remember that's Prett's office, so he knew this on that day.
"October 3, the Weiner case agent was “agitated” over the sound of “crickets” from headquarters & the “inaccurate” statements of Director Comey regarding the number of emails they possessed. He felt compelled to push the issue in New York, all the way up to U.S. Attorney Preet"
Hold the bus, Preet already knew on Sept 28.
"Extremely concerned, the case agent went to the U.S. attorneys for the SDNY. An assistant US attorney told the inspector general the agent believed “somebody was not acting appropriately, somebody was trying to bury this.” The attorneys were concerned the agent might “act out.”
So Preet and his office already knew, but did zero, until the agent spoke out. Then the SDNY made it sound like they were the ones concerned, especially abt a whistle blower. Did you catch the switch here?
The FBI, DOJ and ----> SDNY got caught out...Now watch what happens.
"Preet instructed his deputy to call the Justice Department directly in case “something had fallen through the cracks.” That call made it impossible for the FBI and DOJ to continue to keep this “trove” buried. 'con't'.. Did you see what Preet did?
He passed the blame to the FBI/DOJ all while he was culpable and complicit in the delay.
Con't.... "The same day, October 21, Agent Strzok wrote to Lisa Page: Toscas at DOJ was “now aware NY has hrc-huma emails via weiner invest[igation].” "Finally, five days later, on October 26, the New York case agent was able to talk directly to the mid-year agents."
Preets office did nothing for a whole month and not until the whistle blower came forward. Also, Preet alerted, gave the heads up, gave the caw-caw signal to the FBI and DOJ that the gig was up. This allowed them 5 whole days to come up with a plan.
As I have said for abt 2 years.....Dig into Preet.........
Don't forget the Weiner case was in the hands of Preet.
"According to law enforcement sources familiar with the matter, federal prosecutors have opened an investigation into the allegations that is in its early stages...con't
"According to law enforcement sources familiar with the matter, federal prosecutors have opened an investigation into the allegations that is in its early stages...con't
but already includes a subpoena for Weiner's cellphone records. The U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, Preet Bharara, had no comment." Dated Sept 22, 2016
People in the NYPD know....... "Breitbart reported on November 4, 2016 that the New York Police Department officers who had seen the evidence on Weiner’s laptop had threatened to blow the whistle."
You just have to ask around and nobody is doing it.
Ask yourself why?
You just have to ask around and nobody is doing it.
Ask yourself why?
Here is one answer:
In regards to the NYPD blowing the whistle watch what happened ---> "Remarkably, the “Justice Department” shut them down by allegedly threatening to indict NYPD officers on the two-year old death of Eric Gardner if the NYPD disclosed it."
In regards to the NYPD blowing the whistle watch what happened ---> "Remarkably, the “Justice Department” shut them down by allegedly threatening to indict NYPD officers on the two-year old death of Eric Gardner if the NYPD disclosed it."
So you have an FBI agent and people in the NYPD ready to blow the whistle. Both are stalled and one is threatened. hmmmmmm...
Another question would be if the Clinton's emails were known by FBI, DOJ and SDNY why didn't any of them seek another warrant for all of Weiner's correspondence, Cloud, Google accts, etc. This is a case of National security isn't it? If they did where is it?
"According to the warrant, law enforcement officials had asked the judge to authorize the search of a silver Dell Inspiron 15 7000 Series laptop computer." Why did they just go after the 1 device and not all of them?
BC they needed to remove the evidence of what was known.
BC they needed to remove the evidence of what was known.
Mind you that warrant was on Oct 30, 2016
The one obtained by NYPD read, in part: “Depending on circumstances, a complete review of the seized [electronically stored information] may require examination of all of the seized data to evaluate its contents and determine whether the data is responsive to the warrant.”...
...The FBI one read, in part: “Law enforcement personnel will make reasonable efforts to restrict their search to data falling within the categories of evidence specified in the warrant.”
So the NYPD could look at everything but the FBI could only look at "certain areas"?
Does the NYPD have more that has not been revealed?
Is this why the NYPD was threatened?
Did the NYPD tell Preet of this threat?
Does the NYPD have more that has not been revealed?
Is this why the NYPD was threatened?
Did the NYPD tell Preet of this threat?
Don't forget this...."because Weiner’s attorney himself delivered the emails to the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York." Once again...Preet was the first to know of this..how/why was he surprised abt the whistle blower?
Why did Preet need the whistle blower to act? Why didn't he do it first?
This is the kinda things he glorifies abt himself, along w. others, "The champion of the people!"
Yeah right.
Add in: to blow this case wide open would give him a clear path to the FBI director's position.
This is the kinda things he glorifies abt himself, along w. others, "The champion of the people!"
Yeah right.
Add in: to blow this case wide open would give him a clear path to the FBI director's position.
But if HIllary won..no such path would exist. <--------------
read this mini thread
So what could Preet do? He set up Comey and McCabe to take the fall if Trump won and if Hillary won Comey was being fired (we know why) and McCabe looked incompetent.
But Trump is no dummy..it is why he canned Preet.
Trump knows. Preet is dirty. He is the Swamp............
Trump knows. Preet is dirty. He is the Swamp............
Last but not least, SDNY was investigating Weiner, not EDNY. So why did the DOJ go after the EDNY & not the SDNY? I mean after all it was also the SDNY & Preet that "supposedly" cough cough, blew the whistle on all of this. Yet no retaliation was used against them. Funny huh.
