Here's what I don't get: how did the Inspector General report lead to McCabe facing demotion but *not* to any consequences for the FBI illegally leaking to Rudy Giuliani in October '16—an effort to pressure McCabe and Comey into re-opening the Clinton probe under false pretenses?
2/ And how did the Inspector General report not lead to *any* consequences for agents in "Trumplandia" (the New York office of the FBI) who slow-walked Comey's early-October 2016 order to confirm or deny whether the Clinton emails on Weiner's PC were new? That swung the election.
3/ I think what we're getting is a selective reading of the Inspector General report—one that leads to quick consequences for supposed anti-Trump elements in the FBI but no public consequences for the confirmed, larger, more influential, more organized militant pro-Trump faction.
