There is COMPELLING circumstantial evidence suggesting votes were changed by Russian hackers and Trump may not have been elected president. The type of evidence discussed here is the same type of probative evidence used in EVERY criminal case. A MUST-READ. theroot.com/evidence-shows…
2/ Direct evidence: you look out your window and see it raining.
Circumstantial evidence: you come out of your house in the morning and see the grass is soaking wet and say, "This is *some* evidence it rained last night."
Enough evidence of the latter sort and a case is built.
Circumstantial evidence: you come out of your house in the morning and see the grass is soaking wet and say, "This is *some* evidence it rained last night."
Enough evidence of the latter sort and a case is built.
3/ Could the kompromat Putin has on Trump be...
...that Trump ISN'T the rightful President of the United States?
It would certainly explain why Trump thinks every mention of Russian hacking delegitimizes his 2016 "win."
...that Trump ISN'T the rightful President of the United States?
It would certainly explain why Trump thinks every mention of Russian hacking delegitimizes his 2016 "win."
4/ "The only explanation that could possibly explain why Russians didn't change votes in Georgia is to believe an international cabal of hackers got into the system, found instructions, voter registrations, and passwords to voting machines yet decided not to do it—just because."
