Profile picture
Swiss Ramble @SwissRamble
, 39 tweets, 30 min read Read on Twitter
Manchester United are the second Premier League club after #MCFC to publish 2017/18 financial results, covering a season when they were runners-up in the league and FA Cup, but were eliminated by Sevilla in the Champions League last 16. Some thoughts in the following thread #MUFC
#MUFC profit before tax down from £57m to £26m, mainly due to higher player costs, as wage bill shot up £32m and player amortisation rose £14m, while revenue only up £9m. Tax bill increased from £17m to £63m as a change in US corporate tax rate led to a £49m non-cash write-off.
#MUFC revenue only grew £9m (2%). Only meaningful increase was broadcasting, up £10m (5%) to £204m. Commercial income was basically flat at £276m, while match day dropped £2m (2%) to £110m. Profit on player sales rose £7m to £18m.
#MUFC wage bill climbed £32m (12%) to a Premier League high of £296m, while player amortisation increased £14m (11%) to £138m. Other expenses were slightly down at £117m, but net finance costs were £6m (26%) lower at £18m (due to unrealised foreign exchange gains).
Despite the fall in profit, #MUFC £26m would still have been around mid-table in 2016/17. Worth noting that thanks to TV money and wage controls, the Premier League is now very profitable with only one club reporting a loss, while many had huge profits (#LCFC £92m, #THFC £58m).
The #MUFC strategy has not been overly reliant on player sales and 2017/18 was no exception with only £18m earned from this activity, mainly Januzaj to Real Sociedad and sell-on fees. For perspective, this would have been one of the lowest in the 2016/17 Premier League.
#MUFC have reported profits for three years in a row, averaging £44m in that period. In fact, £57m in 2017 and £49m in 2016 are among the highest profits in the entire history of the Premier League (5th and 7th respectively). Loss in 2015 was due to lack of European football.
#MUFC results have hardly ever been boosted by player sales with 2009 being the last year where this made a meaningful contribution (Ronaldo’s £80m sale to Real Madrid). Since then, only one year has been above £20m, namely 2015, and that was just £24m.
Of course, #MUFC profits would have been substantially higher if they did not have to bear the cost of the Glazers’ leveraged buy-out. In fact, in the last 10 years they made operating profits of £651m, which have been largely offset by net financing costs of £523m.
The good news is that the cost of #MUFC debt has reduced following a series of refinancings from a horrific £117m in 2009 to “only” £18m in 2018. Coupled with explosive revenue growth, this means that financing costs have been cut from 42% of revenue in 2009 to just 3%.
#MUFC EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Tax, Depreciation & Amortisation), which can be considered as a proxy for cash operating profit, fell by £23m from last season’s record £200m to £177m, though this is still around double the £92m in 2012. Forecast is £175-190m for 2018/19.
However, #MUFC EBITDA of £177m is still excellent, underlining their incredible ability to generate cash. To place this into context, #MCFC are £52m lower with £125m, while #AFC are likely to fall from £138m due to lack of Champions League in 2017/18. Only 4 PL clubs above £100m.
Although #MCFC revenue “only” increased by 2% in 2017/18, this is not unusual in the second year of the Premier League TV deal. Since 2013 revenue has grown by an incredible £227m (62%) from £363m to £590m, due to commercial £124m and TV £103m. Forecast is £615-630m for 2019.
#MUFC revenue of £590m is the highest in England, £90m more than the closest challenger #MCFC £500m. There is then a fairly sizeable gap to the next clubs (#AFC £423m, #LFC £364m, #CFC £361m & #THFC £306m), though some of these will increase when 2017/18 results published.
Based on 2016/17 figures, #MUFC had the highest revenue in the Deloitte Money League for the second year in a row, with their £581m revenue just above Real Madrid £580m, followed by Barcelona £557m and Bayern Munich £505m, though will be overtaken by Madrid in 2017/18 (€751m)
Somewhat disappointingly, #MUFC commercial income was basically flat at £276m, despite 7 new sponsorship deals including their first sleeve sponsor. That said, this revenue stream has grown by an impressive £124m (81%) since 2013.
However, to place this into context, #MUFC £276m commercial income is still £44m higher than #MCFC £232m. It is also at least £140m more than their next closest challengers (2016/17 figures): #LFC £136m, #CFC £133m, #AFC £117m, #THFC £73m and #WHUFC £35m.
#MUFC Chevrolet shirt sponsorship worth £58m a season ($75m at current exchange rates), while Adidas kit deal is an amazing £75m (though cut by 30% if fail to reach Champions League for 2 or more seasons). Aon pay £15m for training kit/facilities, Kohler £10m for sleeve sponsor.
The importance of commercial business to #MUFC is clear, as 47% of their 2017/18 revenue came from this revenue stream. The only comparable club is #MCFC 46%, while #LFC and #CFC are only at 37% and other clubs are significantly lower.
#MUFC TV money from the Premier League increased £9m to £150m, boosted by finishing 2nd versus 6th the previous season (meaning a higher merit payment). They actually received more than champions #MCFC £149m, as they were shown live 28 times (compared to 26 for City).
Assuming that English TV pool was unchanged in 2017/18, #MUFC earned €39m from Europe for reaching the Champions League last 16, €6m less than the previous season when they won the Europa League by beating Ajax in the final. Champions League winners Real Madrid received €87m.
#MUFC Champions League revenue of €39m was much lower than runners-up #LFC €78m and quarter-finalists #MCFC £62m. Also below #CFC €64m and #THFC €62m, even though all 3 clubs fell at last 16, because United only got half the TV pool, having qualified via the Europa League.
#MUFC relatively poor performance in Europe, including not even qualifying 2014/15, means that they have “only” earned €170m in the last 5 years. That’s not too shabby, but it is a hefty €107m less than #MCFC €277m. Also below #CFC €216m and #AFC €214m.
#MUFC match day income fell £2m (2%) from £112m to £110m, as they staged 5 fewer home games (3 in Europe, 2 in domestic cups). However, this was still easily the highest in the top flight: £10m above #AFC £100m, £36m more than #LFC £74m (though this will grow in 17/18).
#MUFC 75,000 average attendance was again the highest in the Premier League, around 7,000 more than #THFC following their use of Wembley. Season ticket prices have been frozen for 7 consecutive years, while £15 tickets for 18 to 25-year-olds have been introduced in 2018-19.
#MUFC wage bill grew £32m (12%) from £264m to £296m, mainly due to player salary uplifts related to Champions League participation plus 5 months of Alexis Sanchez, resulting in an increase in the wages to turnover ratio from 45% to a still very respectable 50%.
Not only is #MUFC wage bill just shy of the £300m barrier, but it is the highest ever reported by a Premier League club. In the last 3 years, it has grown by an incredible £93m (46%). It is now £36m above #MCFC £260m, the highest gap for many years.
Of course, #MUFC £296m wage bill is also miles above the other leading clubs: Chelsea £220m, Liverpool £208m, Arsenal £199m and Tottenham £127m (though in fairness these are all 2016/17 figures).
Despite the increase in #MUFC wages to turnover ratio from 45% to 50%, this is still one of the lowest (best) in Premier League, though not as low as #THFC 41% and # #AFC 47%. This important ratio has been maintained in a tight range between 45% and 51% for the last few years.
#MUFC player amortisation, the annual charge to expense transfer fees over the length of a player’s contract, continued to rise, up 11% (£14m) from £124m to £138m, reflecting further investment in the squad (Lukaku, Matic, Lindelof & Sanchez in 2017/18).
As a result, #MUFC player amortisation of £138m is again the highest in the Premier League, just above #MCFC £134m. Both Manchester clubs are way ahead of #CFC £88m and #AFC £77m.
#MUFC averaged around £110m net spend for 4 years up to 2017/18 (purchases £158m, sales £47m), but only £53m to date in 2018/19 (mainly Fred and Diogo Dalot), giving some justification to Mourinho’s complaints. In the last 5 seasons net spend is £495m, only behind #MCFC £580m.
#MUFC net debt increased by £41m from £213m to £254m, mainly due to £48m reduction in cash balance from £290m to £242m. In Sterling terms, gross debt was down £7m from £503m to £496m, though the USD debt remains unchanged. Amounts owed on transfers not disclosed (£179m in 2017).
So, even after all the Glazers’ various refinancings, #MUFC still owe the best part of half a billion pounds, more than twice as much as #AFC £227m (the Emirates Stadium loan). Worth noting that #CFC have around £1.2 bln debt in their holding company.
Although it has reduced, #MUFC annual interest payment of £19m is a lot more than any other Premier League club with Arsenal being the only other club with a double-digit interest payment of £12m. To place that into perspective, Manchester City and Liverpool only pay around £3m.
On the other hand, #MUFC also have the highest cash balance of £242m, much more than most Premier League clubs. Tottenham’s £200m is misleading, as this is largely due to advances for their stadium development, leaving only Arsenal £180m as anywhere close.
#MUFC cash decreased by £48m, mainly because of a steep fall in cash generated from operating activities, due to timing of cash receipts on commercial contracts. Net £108m spent on players (purchases £155m, sales £47m). Another £22m paid out in dividends.
In last 9 years #MUFC have had an incredible £1.6 bln cash: operating activities £1.3 bln plus £318m share issue. £653m has been spent on players and £91m on infrastructure, but £784m used to finance Glazers’ investment: £461m interest, £248m debt repayments & £75m dividends.
Ed Woodward spoke of “continued strong long-term financial performance, which underpins everything we do and allows us to compete for top talent in an increasingly competitive transfer market.” That’s undoubtedly true, but will #MUFC now deliver on the pitch?
Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.

Like this thread? Get email updates or save it to PDF!

Subscribe to Swiss Ramble
Profile picture

Get real-time email alerts when new unrolls are available from this author!

This content may be removed anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member and get exclusive features!

Premium member ($30.00/year)

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!