These attitudes don't surprise me and exist on all sides of the spectrum. We just find different ways to justify it.
theguardian.com/politics/2019/…
Remain was about facts and evidence, about keeping the status quo.
Leave was an avalanche of emotional triggers: change, empowerment ('take control') and fears.
In Facts Vs Emotions, latter always wins.
Once that happens, people justify almost anything to carry on believing. Even 'economic apocalypse'.
And if you attack that belief, the emotional attachment becomes STRONGER not weaker. They believe even more all this is scaremongering.
This is why ERG group so influential
Because Remainers have clung even stronger (emotionally) to their own world, which they see as driven by facts. The divide has hardened.
We're not superior in any way, we make the same mistakes. We also cling on to narratives about the world driven more by emotion than fact. We like to believe otherwise but... 🤷🏽♂️
Leavers still looks at us like a bunch of clueless idiots... and frankly we are. At every stage they have understood how to move people better than we have.
This is why Leavers have been ignoring the bad news as 'project fear'. These natural tendencies exist on all sides.
- don't belittle them
- don't use 'facts' or emphasise that point. You're saying they're ignorant.
- use people they trust not ones we are comfortable with, to communicate
What's our positive / inspirational vision of the future, told in relatable stories?
We don't have them, so we spend all our time attacking Leavers instead, which ensures debate is on their terms.
'Britain was great in the past, we can go back to that glory'.
We can ridicule it or hate it. But it works. And our hatred only makes them stronger because we have no positive emotional story to tell in response.