,
16 tweets,
10 min read
Read on Twitter
Correcting misunderstanding of the Constitution is, frankly, a mostly thankless task. Ever since the 2016 campaign season became Trump vs. Clinton, left-side Twitternauts have repeatedly accused @realDonaldTrump of #treason.
This search on Twitter reveals the earliest accusations that candidate Trump was guilty of #treason.
twitter.com/search?q=trump…
twitter.com/search?q=trump…
Why does this matter?
Well, someone has finally figured out that the penalties for #treason, and has turned @realDonaldTrump's suggestion that the #fakerussiancollusion #gambit constituted #treason into a call for #executions.
Well, someone has finally figured out that the penalties for #treason, and has turned @realDonaldTrump's suggestion that the #fakerussiancollusion #gambit constituted #treason into a call for #executions.
Congressman @davidcicilline sent this tweet out early this afternoon: 
But @davidcicilline has leaped rather far at the front end by assuming that @realDonaldTrump's use of the term #Treason was intended to be a call for executions.
Unless, is @davidcicilline willing to admit that, beginning in late 2015, and coming forward to today, leftists in Congress, in media, in entertainment, in activism, who've all publicly accused @realDonaldTrump of #treason were also all calling for the #execution of #Trump?
Seriously, I could do this all day long, Congressman. Literally thousands of tweets from uninformed boobs in academia, media, government, all, as you see it, calling for the execution of the President.
And ever since the lefttard lunacy started, I have been patiently explaining the limits of treason. And when Trump used the word in reference to his address to Congress and in reference to the phony #russiancollusion nonsense, I tweeted corrections of his takes too.
But, honestly, your approach is just grossly disingenuous because I cannot find a single time where you've corrected your fans, friends, or constituents for calling for Trump's execution.
@threadreaderapp unroll
