, 11 tweets, 4 min read Read on Twitter
There were some not very useful infographics of the EU election data going around yesterday and some dodgy takes based on them. I’ve tried to visualise the results here in a way that you can meaningfully compare them with voting in the 2016 referendum. 👇 #infographic #brexit Chart showing how 16.1m remain and 17.4m leave voters from 2016 compare to the 6.9m remain, 5.9m no-deal-leave and 3.8m leave-with-a-deal votes in the 2019 EU election.
The most important take away is that there are a lot of people voted in the 2016 referendum but probably aren’t that bothered about Brexit either way (and so didn’t turn out for these elections, despite there being so much to play for politically).
Of the people who are bothered, almost no one wants to leave with a deal. Remain is the destination with the most votes (makes sense, everyone knows what remaining is, whereas there are flavours of leaving) but if you add the two flavours of leave together they got more votes.
Obviously this is a gross simplification because both Tory and Labour positions are so contorted we don't know what people who voted for them really want. We would need to assume that a million more of them (>25%) would choose no-deal over remain, for no deal to come out on top.
This is all relatively small numbers though! What is important is that there are about 7 million people who passionately want to remain, about 6 million people who passionately want to leave with no deal, and about 20 million people who voted in 2016 but aren’t so passionate.
This means that, should there be a second referendum, it will be won, like the first one, by whoever is better at reaching those people who aren’t that passionate/engaged. These are people who don’t usually follow politics and who’s attention needs to be bought on Facebook.
That’s why Facebook advertising was so impactful in 2016 and will be in a future referendum unless it’s got under control. (It was a side show in these elections with the top spenders this year spending less than 10% of what Vote Leave spent in 2016).
The news got buried by the Independent Group defections (in the week it was published) but the Commons inquiry into “Disinformation and ‘fake news’” concluded that “Electoral law is not fit for purpose and needs to be changed to reflect changes in campaigning techniques”.
Their report sets out a host of recommendations for bringing digital campaigning in line with all the norms and standards of transparency that apply to campaigning in traditional media:
publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201719/cm…
I explained a few months ago why the illegal Facebook advertising activity in 2016 probably swung the referendum result. If we are to have another referendum, or meaningful election, we need to get the rules in place first. [ends]
Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.

Like this thread? Get email updates or save it to PDF!

Subscribe to Ross Atkin
Profile picture

Get real-time email alerts when new unrolls are available from this author!

This content may be removed anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!