A (last tx 31-07-2019) blockchain.com/en/btc/address…
B (last tx 26-05-2019)
blockchain.com/en/btc/address…
C (last tx 13-08-2019)
blockchain.com/en/btc/address…
D (last tx 04-04-2019)
blockchain.com/en/btc/address…
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/58181/58181d3910069d52eb3e9409b25cfd8e622a1804" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/907fb/907fb265c33d8dafe951ee3b24b7d56ff783bf9e" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b2ce9/b2ce9f86be81ba1e5c826b54319770a002f233e3" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5f35a/5f35a32611e5096283ddf4acb6bd708137f6b603" alt=""
Funds from Wallet C have been recently sent to multiple addresses created specifically for those txs, where they remain parked
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4008/d40083fc57c8249a8c3168e5c46748ac888d264e" alt=""
Yet its difficult to attribute all the BTC on flagged add-sses to PlusToken,as exchanges and hosted wallet providers usually aggregate client funds
This makes for a much smaller, albeit serious, selling pressure than feared
You can check for yourself using the wallet addresses from the earlier tweet.
These txs look like normal exchange fund-shuffling operations
Thanks to @CrystalPlatform for providing the data