,
11 tweets,
4 min read
Read on Twitter
Here is some research-based evidence for @Warwickshire_CC (thread)
A Sexual Health research study published in the BMJ, of 16 - 18 year-olds, concluded "Young people's narratives normalised coercive, painful and unsafe anal heterosex." bmjopen.bmj.com/content/4/8/e0…
For girls, imitating porn can cause catastrophic life-changing injuries. nypost.com/2019/01/16/tee…
One in three teenage girls has experienced some form of sexual violence from a partner. endviolenceagainstwomen.org.uk/about/data-on-…
A recent US research study showed that 13 percent of sexually active girls ages 14 to 17 have been choked during sex. theatlantic.com/health/archive…
A review of research on the impact of internet pornography found that consumption was linked to attitudinal changes, with women viewed as "sexual playthings eager to fulfill male sexual desires." tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.108…
The authors of that study found that "adolescents who are intentionally exposed to violent sexually explicit material were six times more likely to be sexually aggressive than those who were not exposed."
A 2014 survey found that “the more pornography a man watches, the more likely he was to use it during sex" and "request particular pornographic sex acts of his partner" researchgate.net/publication/26…
A man is also more likely to "deliberately conjure images of pornography during sex to maintain arousal, and have concerns over his own sexual performance and body image.”
The 'rough sex' defence is increasingly used by men who kill their partners. standpointmag.co.uk/issues/may-201…
How did @Warwickshire_CC assess that this programme was "thoroughly researched"? @educationgovuk statutory RSE guidance specifies that schools must check credentials of providers, assess the resources and share with parents. How did such material slip through?
