, 14 tweets, 4 min read Read on Twitter
This video is making the rounds.

One (understandable) reaction I've seen: 🤦‍♂️🤷‍♂️

I'll take it seriously and ask, "what is a `broken window' foreign policy and how would it work?"

[THREAD]
Admittedly, the video is a bit vague on defining a "broken window" in international politics.

It lumps territorial invasion (Crimea), chemical weapon use in the midst of civil war (Syria), and genocide in the midst of war (Rwanda; Srebrenica in Yugoslavia).
Stephens' book might be more insightful

books.google.com/books?id=nt7ZC…
On page 218, he writes
Okay, so that's basically what he also said in the video. But the next paragraph is more enlightening
Ah, I see. So just as windows are small parts of a neighborhood street, small states are a small part of a region.

So, the theory goes, we can't let transgressions in or to small states -- even ones without a clear national interest -- go without a (limited) response.
The idea behind the theory is that by blowing up some assets of an aggressor of small states (or vulnerable groups within a state), this will deter the next aggressor.

Sounds very 👇
I identify (at least) four problems with this theory:
1) Seems that mission creep could set in very fast ("We have to keep `police' on this beat because windows keep breaking").

For example, didn't US involvement in Vietnam start off with a similar limited aim?
2) Who defines the "norms" being violated? What about the norm of "territorial integrity" and "sovereignty"? Just War theorists are still debating this issue:

oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/o…
3) Is it just cases of killing? Are we invoking R2P? Unless I'm mistaken, R2P doesn't have the best reputation (as it has been susceptible to abuse)

journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.117…
4) Would it work? Would it actually deter "bad apples" in the future? Given that "broken window" policing was debunked (and given that it would rely on the US to be `ever vigilant'), I'm not so sure.

npr.org/2016/11/01/500…
That's just a snapshot of the possible issues with Stephen's theory. For more, see this 2015 piece by @dandrezner

washingtonpost.com/posteverything…
In short, after taking time to think through the "broken window" theory of US foreign policy, I can understand why people are reacting with 🤷‍♂️🤦‍♂️

[END]
Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.

Like this thread? Get email updates or save it to PDF!

Subscribe to Paul Poast
Profile picture

Get real-time email alerts when new unrolls are available from this author!

This content may be removed anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!