Bear with me.
Alas, my former UAE paper ended the column because of this article I wrote for @ForeignPolicy:
foreignpolicy.com/2018/06/04/qat…
All I wanted was to write freely, despite the massive opportunity costs.
When news of Khashoggi’s death came out, I was asked to write on it.
That’s when troubles started with @gwupoe.
I was asked to wait till Riyadh confirmed the news; it was denying it at the time.
I communicated some of this to my editor & put off writing that piece about Khashoggi.
1) this is an academic environment.
2) I was writing about human rights abuses & growing authoritarianism in the MENA region.
3) I was writing under my name.
Talk about First Amendment.
This time last year, I’d thought I was now free: I was working for an American academic institution & writing for an American magazine.
But not so fast.
(The editor said that’s not how it works & Hassan should send that request himself.)
So we exchanged emails. I asked him to explain the source of panic. I had no idea whether there were any existing ties with the UAE.
Some of those I worked for had no choice but to bow to the pressure.
I was a new comer to DC, I arrived here in 2016. Those have been paying millions upon millions to nurture contacts to amplify their messages.
Certainly, do NOT just take their word for it & turn away those critics. That's disgraceful, esp to editors/analysts
Does “commitment to academic freedom” apply to calling a NYT journalist a “bedbug” but not to criticizing rich Middle Eastern autocrats?