@CourthouseNews
@CourthouseNews
For such an important and solemn occasion, Nadler adds, it is appropriate for all members to make an opening statement, a change from the typical chair and ranking member stmt.
The second - obstruction of Congress.
"Other presidents have resisted congressional oversight. The president's stonewall was absolute and without precedent in American history," Nadler says.
Do they rise to level of high crimes and misdemeanors?
What are the consequences for our nat'l security, integrity of elections and our country if we fail to act.
"Both investigations were divorced from reality and U.S. foreign policy."
Trump "did everything in his power to obstruct the investigation.
He ordered every official to defy subpoenas, at his command, the admin. refused to produce a single document.
"Not one."
The highest of high crimes is abuse of power and comes when a POTUS pursues his own personal interest than the public good.
Trump's conduct weakened relationships with our allies and weakened America itself.
Some ask why not take more time? Why is this nec. now? Why do we need to impeach the POTUS? Why not let next election handle it?
The better question, Nadler says, is: what is the risk if we do not act?
#ImpeachmentHearing
@CourthouseNews
Collins also says Trump will be POTUS for five more years.
"The committee does not want to find the truth, that's the only obstruction here. It would be against Adam Schiff and the majority, not the president."
Take a look and read about who Collins' equal was when Nixon was impeached in the 70s. Much different time. courthousenews.com/tensions-sure-…
"What we're debating here, in my opinion, is the weakest case in history & yet the Democrats decide to go full speed ahead because of the clock and calendar with an incomplete record."
Let's take a moment to remember the words of Robert McClory, a Republican committee member from Illinois who argued for Nixon’s impeachment based on his obstruction of Congress:
"Where truth rests, trust builds. The Constitution is a plain language set of laws that Americans for generations have adhered to and been protected by. It's a list of crimes and forbidden actions not to be taken by our governors."
Indeed.
This is a powerful moment. This is a duly elected black woman sitting on the dais calling for the impeachment of the president 156 years after slavery ended in the U.S.
@CourthouseNews
She said: "The bright light of this constitutional democracy dimmed because of his acts... We must reject his abuse of power."
Rep Sheila Jackson Lee will tell you:
courthousenews.com/congress-bubbl…
This messaging, arguably, tracks, for 2019.
The world is watching how we handle this crisis. There are nations who are trying to reestablish Democratic governments after years of autocratic rule that are watching
The president's defenders shout "coup," "hoax" while off the record acknowledge his wrong-doing.
We do not take this step to divide.
Some will argue the impeachment of this president will further divide an already fractured union. But there is a difference between division and clarification.
The full quote from Washington: "The Constitution which at any time exists, till changed by an explicit and authentic act of the whole people, is sacredly obligatory upon all."
"See you in the field in 2020," Gaetz says. Upon delivering his remarks, Gaetz, Rep Johnson, Rep Ratcliffe share a smile and laugh, a nod of approval
"We call it a sham because we don't have a better way to describe it," he says.
If you're a constitutional lawyer, I invite you to weigh in on the thread here. And DM me if you like. Let's talk about how amorphous abuse of power article is.
Swalwell: "My dad believed no one is above the law."
No one is above the law, Swalwell reiterates, before zeroing in on Trump