Thread by @JackPosobiec

If you are against all drone strikes then I hear you and that's a principled stand

But don't try to sit there and tell me Obama and Brennan's 'signature strikes' that took out women and children were morally superior to taking out one general with no reported collateral damage

Signature strikes started under Bush and identified targets by virtue of their ages, actions, and locations inside 'countries known to house terrorist operatives' bear the “signature” of militant activity

"Hey this looks like a terrorist camp"

"Is it?"

"Pretty sure. Let's waste it"

Civilians aren't just collateral damage in the modern era.

Bombing civilians is what creates more terrorists / adversaries and is probably the worst possible move the United States could make

Regardless of who is President