If I were paranoid I'd say that these sort of things are going to keep happening to areas that oppose Trump.
The director estimates that only 0.001% of the records, the "heart and soul" of the region, are digitized.
seattletimes.com/seattle-news/t…
The director estimates that only 0.001% of the records, the "heart and soul" of the region, are digitized.
seattletimes.com/seattle-news/t…
I mean, how much you want to bet a bunch of this stuff gets damaged or lost in transit?
Destroy a place's history, and it's a lot easier to change/delegitimize/etc.
Destroy a place's history, and it's a lot easier to change/delegitimize/etc.
Oh, btw, it's only the repository for treaty documents relating to the 272 federally recognized tribes in Alaska, Washington, Oregon, and Idaho.
So I'm sure the decision to move the records to <checks notes> Southern California & Kansas City will have no negative repercussions.
So I'm sure the decision to move the records to <checks notes> Southern California & Kansas City will have no negative repercussions.
And I'm sure splitting them up between two different areas FAR from the place that these records are, you know, ABOUT will have no negative effects on people's ability to locate and access the information in them.
I mean, I think we know why.
It's a painful sort of irony that I just did a thread about Nazi information destruction re: LGBT people and the effect on communities they were targeting and then I see the news on this.
:-/
:-/
