My Authors
Read all threads
We believe we speak not only for ourselves, but other similar firms, projects & researchers working toward verifiable, accurate, secure & transparent election administration technology, when we observe that @ShadowIncHQ crossed a line & damaged other important work... Thread/
2/ The line they crossed is between one type of tech: campaign, electioneering, or organizing Apps, and another type of tech: mission-critical, application-specific, fault tolerant software, firmware & hardware to manage voter data, ballot data, and election data when...
3/ ...they lack the training and experience in using security-centric engineering practices to develop, test, and deploy this class of technology. It's one thing to build Apps for political campaign messaging & outreach. It's quite another to engineer software to...
4/ ...increase security, lower costs, and improve usability of election administration technology. That is totally different from campaigns or electioneering, which is part of the important arena of "CivicTech", while election administration is the heavier lift of "GovTech"...
5/ ...and the 2 categories of tech must NOT be confused nor conflated. We've spent most of today explaining to the Media how GovTech needs to be engineered & developed, and how the amateur effort we all witnessed in Iowa for a needless App should never be compared.
6/ @ShadowIncHQ had no business trying to build an App on a shoestring in 2-3 months that handled ballot-type data (even if only caucus data w/ paper backup). That kind of work (if necessary at all) needs to be left to those w/ the capabilities to do so; in other words...
7/ ...deeply experienced software & computer science firms like: @free_and_fair, @galois, @voting_works, @MITREcorp, @DXCTechnology and others (humbly including ourselves @OSET & @TrustTheVote).
8/ What's also frustrating is that the Democrats initially made a great case for their understanding the importance of election security, innovating election technology and issues like keeping ballot data away from tcp/ip networks until researchers figure out the security...
9/ ...and then the DNC + IDP demolished those efforts in a single ill-advised project that was a solution in search of a problem. For what? To keep a software shop busy? To make an election feel so "21st century?" To engage more participants? To appease a donor?
10/ The only thing they successfully did was demonstrate how to damage the fragile trust so imperative to our democracy & administration of elections. That is #failure at its worst (agree @SimonWDC & @boblord?) Henceforth, others contemplating similar tech initiatives, please...
11/ ...let those who've been educated, trained, and are experienced in this category of engineering for election administration build that class of technology. You'll find they believe just b/c something can be done doesn't mean it should & avoid solutions in search of problems.
12/ PS: That kind of high-assurance technology doesn't come at the basement bargain price of $68K, or take 8 weeks to build and launch without robust full-stack, system-, load- and pen- testing (let alone training + resiliency planning (i.e., scaling phone support)). /END
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh.

Enjoying this thread?

Keep Current with OSET Institute

Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!