Live tweeting from the co2-budget.com conference. First up: the inimitable @KevinClimate, who never minces words. Distressingly little progress for the climate emergency, compared with covid response. 1/n
2. Reminder: It's the carbon budget, the area under the emissions curve, that determines warming. More emissions now means more (up to impossible) cuts later. @KevinClimate
3. Net zero is NOT based on a total carbon budget (which forces us to face actions demanded today). Net zero is focused on far future (2045, 2050)- generational passing of the buck to future policymakers & scientists. Assumes all tons are =, ignores GHGs, sources. @KevinClimate
4. @KevinClimate is not opposed to carbon dioxide removal/carbon capture/nature-based solutions. Here's his position: research, require stringent sustainability standards- but mitigate NOW assuming they will not work at scale. Energy must be real (not net) zero emissions.
5. More problems with net zero climate target: UK 2050 targets assume substantial fossil emissions 2050 + beyond (more than avg Kenyan today!). Assumes massive carbon removal massively deployed by future generations. From physics (C budget) to legal (highest poss). @KevinClimate
6. "Highest possible ambition" for UK #netzero 2050 doesn't envision any reduction in car km-traveled by 2035... misses equity by failing to focus on high emitters... disguises incremental tinkering of business as usual as real Paris-worthy ambition. @KevinClimate
7. Analysis by @KevinClimate shows "leading" #netzero focused, UK and Swedish climate policies are headed for 2.5-3°C. Their carbon budgets are 2-3x higher than real Paris-compliant budget for 1.5-2°C.
8. Replace #netzero with carbon budgets aligned w/ Paris 1.5-2°C; key is NO SUBSTITUTION between categories to remove fiddling. Need real zero for all energy by 2035; separate target for process emissions (also real zero 2035, help poor countries w/ cement for devt) @KevinClimate
Real zero by 2035 ("if that sounds impossible, then we should have started earlier; we did the impossible within 2 years for covid and the banking crisis")
10. What abt fair climate mitigation? "We've left [emissions reductions] so late that the best we can hope for is the least unfair approach." One option, represent other's interests in negotiations (e.g., US represents Ghana). But ea country sovereign own C budget. @KevinClimate
11. Recognizing carbon inequality means that mitigation will look different btwn countries & classes. To meet Paris climate targets, high emitters need to make profound lifestyle changes; physical infrastructure change will addresse most emissions for average folks. @KevinClimate
12. @KevinClimate: For 1.5°C warming, we should be aiming for 0.5-1t CO2e/person by 2035 from agricultural emissions (methane + N20). Plant-based diets will help lower these, as will best agricultural practices.
13. "We've chosen to squander our opportunity to do something fair about climate change, the rich countries squandered our budgets years ago. Historical emissions need to inform our humility, not our share of carbon budgets." @KevinClimate
14. To get to zero carbon, we must "reorient the productive capacity of society." We'll be making trams, not cars. The quicker we can build renewable energy, the faster we'll move away from fossil fuels. Clean energy is instead of, not on top of, business as usual. @KevinClimate
15. @KevinClimate's view on climate policy: Use different policy suites depending on cultural context, but each country needs to do what's necessary to meet its carbon budget. Global carbon tax becomes a narrative of climate delay, will never happen.
16. #scicomm pluralist @KevinClimate on communicating #climate: "I like PowerPoint presentations, but they haven't changed the world so far. There's not 1 right vision of what the future is, let's have all sorts of visions. Communication is key, but there are multiple right ways"
17. Local carbon budgets are tools for municipalities to tweak/shake the system, from: 1. account for carbon 2. support collaboration 3. take tougher regulations 4. critique norms/structures shaping current mitigation. Sanna Gunnarsson @KTHuniversity#co2budget2021
18. Int'l labor unions promoted #JustTransition for decades to overcome "jobs vs. climate" divide. Sweden's version of JT is "fossil-free welfare state".@JohanGardebo found key diffs from local (survival) vs. central (coordinate) unions in Sweden's high-C industry. #co2budget2021
19. Look to history for evidence of #JustTransitions, like closing wharves in Sweden in 70s, advises @JohanGardebo. Are fossil industries going to die or transition to something else? How can we imagine the future we need? #co2budget2021
21. Carbon trading only exists in today's weak climate framework. If we're serious about necessary reductions for 1.5°C, no country, no sector will have extra carbon capacity for using trading to shift away their burden. @KevinClimate#co2budget2021
22. Science can inform, but can't tell us what's dangerous; that's a messy, unfair, political value judgment process, which has deemed 1.5-2° "least unacceptable". The worry is the rate of change of impacts (proxy=temperature). Value questions central @KevinClimate#co2budget2021
23. "Science is telling us: the decarbonization transition will happen. It's necessary. The #justTransition movement was born so that unions could be "at the table of negotiations, not on the menu." It's a defensive strategy, says Stefania Barca. #co2budget2021
24. "Even with a constructivist hat on, science is the closest thing we have to being apolitical, while technology is inherently political," says @KevinClimate. #co2budget2021
25. "For the small group responsible for most emissions, necessary climate action will not feel like progress. There are no neat prosperous stories for high emitters, about giving up your car to be used as a shared taxi, dividing up your big house." @KevinClimate. #co2budget2021
27. "If we have to make everybody think like us to get rapid climate action, I don't think we will get rapid climate action." @carlymclachlan argues for practical, inclusive coalition building to catalyze necessary changes at scale. #co2budget2021
28. Day 2 #co2buget2021. Emma Wallin @klimsek presents analysis of Nyköping municipality CO2 budget. Most important focus is next 5 years, and sharper policies to quickly reduce transport emissions.
See for yourself! Try the scenarios here: climatevisualizer.com/Nyköping
29. How to make necessary climate emission reductions happen? "We have to think about what science requires, not starting from what is politically possible" Pia Björstrand #lawyersforfuture Nyköping. #co2budget2021
30. Anders Heggestad @klimsek showing how #co2budgets2021 can be used as a tool to translate the #IPCC principle that "more emissions now mean less later" (bc fixed carbon budget = area under the curve).
31. Anders Heggestad @klimsek shows examples of many Swedish cities who have already produced or are working with #co2budget2021.
32. Making + communicating a #co2budget2021 for Tidaholms municipality- identifying, ranking, quantifying policies that can reduce emissions. Communicate: budget means emissions reductions within a set time and all feel responsible to contribute. Hanna Tornevall @ChalmersIndustr
33. We have to focus more on what we do have agency and decision power over, not what we don't. If we all do that, we can take a big step forward in #ClimateAction, says @LiseNordin#co2budget2021
34. "How much will climate policy cost?" is the wrong question; typically ignores co-benefits. Including co-benefits can support politicians + civil society in ambitious policies. @MikaelKarlsson_#co2budget2021.
Review article: tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.10…
35. Nyköping has an eye-popping goal to reduce transport GHG emissions 45% by 2025! This is the scale that #co2budget2021 requires. And they have a plan to do it, + good example from Groningen, who reduced city traffic by 44% with simple measures- Pia Björstrand.
36. I'm impressed! Nyköping municipality in Sweden is following the transport pyramid to prioritize active travel; aims to cut flights (domestic + intl) 55%, with #flightfree campaigns; focused on reducing consumption-based emissions. #co2budget2021
37. "The time is very urgent – we must slow down... Now, we think, is the time to ‘retreat’ into the real work of reclamation, to re-member again our humanity through the intimacy of our relationships." Lovely quote from @BayoAkomolafe cited #co2budget2021 bayoakomolafe.net/project/the-ti…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Paradoxes of #FossilFuels that contribute to #CarbonLockIn, by @JPTilsted: 1. "Everywhere, yet [made] invisible" (slow violence is overlooked); 2. "needed" [claim producers] yet inherently problematic, history of self-regulation a failure; 3. Booming, yet sector in decline
#fossilfuel producers are adding massive capacity, boosted by #plastic production, but industry projections for "transformative change" continue to dispose (yellow) + mismanage (red) plastics. @JPTilsted at @LUCSUS_LU seminar 2/n
Who produces and owns #fossilfuels? Wide range of actors including int'l + national oil firms, states, but also petrochemicals, "emerging market firms". "co-evolution of energy and engineering." Indirect ownership hard to trace + reinforces lock-in, shows @JPTilsted 3/n
Webinar on tools for assessing national #climate pledges (NDCs) by @WRIClimate. @davidwaskow reminds: #ParisAgreement is meant to work thru an iterative process of increasing ambition (faster emission reductions), leading to #netzero emissions by 2050. (Thread 1/n)
The world is currently WAY over our #carbonbudget for where we need to be to align with #ParisAgreement. Orange= countries will do under any event; red = conditional (e.g., will do if they get needed finance). We have LOTSA emissions to reduce fast @davidwaskow@WRIClimate (2/n)
Of 21 indicators assessed for #ParisAgreement:
2 are on track (e.g., crop yields)
13 right direction but too slow (e.g., need electric vehicle sales to be 22x faster than now)
2 in wrong direction: forests, ag emissions @davidwaskow from @climateactiontr, @WRIClimate et al 3/n
.@theAGU hosts a massive conference of Earth and space scientists every December, usually in San Francisco (photos below from previous years). My 1st meeting was in 2003 as a masters' student. In this #thread I'll share highlights from #AGU20, my first time attending virtually!
Something cool I discovered this year at #AGU20 (thanks to @KateBrauman) is the MacGyver session, w/ hacks including a test for #COVID19 in wastewater & a system to lure vineyard pests away with mating calls instead of harmful sprays. agu.confex.com/agu/fm20/meeti…
Now virtually attending @theNASEM workshop on #Sustainability science- input to the 2021 #NobelPrize Summit “Our Planet, Our Future." Register to watch livestream below. Some highlights to follow over next 3 days #Thread
"Autocracies don't publish much data," says @MarshallBBurke. Do existing methods reinforce existing problematic power structures & unsustainable patterns? Given data gaps, need more ways to measure at scale to be able to shine a light on and potentially address power imbalances.
"Equity is about justice and achieving equality of outcomes, so that everyone can see the football match" says @mleach_ids. Seven forms of equity interact to drive how groups experience the world.
Martin Hultman finds 4 kinds of #ClimateChange denial: 1. Organized: groups that spread and support misinformation 2. Party political-ideological: political parties 3. Response: decisions incompatible with claimed climate goals 4. Everyday: ppl know but don't act. @becc_sweden
Very relevant research questions from Martin Hultman. Focus on three key actors in #ClimateChange denial: extractive industries (since 1960), conservative think tanks (1989-), and right-wing nationalism (2008-). @GeoffreySupran, @BenFranta are you in touch with Martin?
Depressingly long history of #ClimateChange denial from Martin Hultman. Glaring gap between knowledge and action- partly explained by deliberate misinformation campaigns, as illustrated with #ExxonKnew tactics to delegitimize science, greenwash & mislead the public.
Communicating #ClimateChange: @NinaWormbs reflects on using technology (satellites) as stand-in for "seeing with our own eyes"; a scientific gaze used to support an economic claim ("melting sea ice will opens Northwest Passage shipping") becc.lu.se/event/theme-me…
Scientific language needs to be precise and non-emotional; @NinaWormbs likens Rachel Carson and Jim Hansen as facing similar communication struggles to convey scientific problems in a way people understand emotionally. @becc_sweden
A re-evaluation of what is rational for people: @NinaWormbs gives overview of research that can help us make sense of #climatechange denial.