Before I start a geeky 'deep dive' on the #NHSnumber, to provide some (personal/professional) context that will hopefully become apparent, I'll just drop these two images here:
So, to begin.
After the Second World War, in a time when we started to think (again) what a #civilised society would be, and when our leaders tried to agree #principles like #UDHR that might prevent the recurrence of genocide, and support #dignity and #HumanRights for all...
...the political leaders of Britain played an active part.
Indeed, #Churchill not only proposed but went on to found the #CouncilOfEurope with other European leaders, helping draft then ratifying #UDHR in '48 - which directly led to #ECHR in '51:
That same year (1951) #WWII ID cards were abolished, after Clarence #Willcock, challenged by PC #Muckle in late 1950, refused to show his #IDcard, purportedly saying: "I'm a Liberal and I am against this sort of thing." Lord #Goddard agreed at appeal, and when Churchill became...
...PM again, he abolished the #IDcards that had been imposed during the War (for wartime purposes) which all the #TinpotBureaucrats and #PettyHitlers so desperately wanted everyone to have to keep using.
[A lesson we'd do well to remember in times of #COVID!]
So the ID cards...
...were collected up and stored in the former Victorian spa hotel in Southport, Merseyside out of which #NationalRegistration and #rationing had been run during the War.
That place was #SmedleyHydro, and it's the building shown in the two photos near the top of this [Thread]...
Meanwhile, and generally acknowledged to have arisen out of the #BeveridgeReport in '42:
...other campaigning I'd been involved in - @NO2ID: Stop the #DatabaseState! - @ukhomeoffice's short-lived '#Identity & Passport Service' from which the #Blair Gov't had tried to issue #IDcards (again) had reverted back to the good old '@HM_Passport Office', which wisely seems...
...to be steering WELL clear of this Government's #VaccinePassport obsession - something that unfortunately cannot be said of @MattHancock's cavalier tech unit, @NHSX, and the #NHSApp. (More of which later.)
But back to #NHSnumbers, which muddled along from the late 1940s...
...until the 1990s - 40 years! - when they were computerised with #CHRIS*.
Now, in the 2020s, they are digitally metamorphosing (metastasising?) into "#NHSlogin" - on which we're keeping a watchful eye!
Which, despite saying it does (naughty, naughty!) DOESN'T provide a "full list of data items held on the PDS" - just some of them:
You can however see the #PDS fields currently exposed via #API, which are interesting - if only to note what HASN'T yet been implemented in the more recent #FHIR one.
Can you spot it?
How it started How it's going
...yup, you're right!
For some reason patients' #consent* doesn't appear to be a priority 🤦🏻♂️🤔
(Yet another reason why the '#NationalDataOptOut' is not yet 'fit for purpose'...)
So, to tie a few things together and ask a few questions:
1) Why is it, if the #NHS issues me an #IDnumber against which it holds my #personal details, and with which it tags all my #clinical details, that *I* cannot see all of the former - nor all of the latter as well?
👇👇👇
[N.B. I appreciate there can be risks and limitations around people's understanding of their own clinical records; and risks of coerced access to both. I'm not suggesting there are simple answers here.]
Ministers may disingenuously say "Patients own their own data" - but if it's ours then why can't we SEE it, and see exactly HOW it's being used? And why do they think they...
...can take a copy of our (#GP) #data without seeking everyone's #permission, for a whole bunch of purposes that aren't anything to do with our own care, that they're not being #honest and #open about?
[Sorry, that was three questions bundled up in one unnumbered one!]
I hope this has been interesting/useful.
A couple of final points before I get some lunch:
1) You CANNOT opt out of #PDS, but it is possible for #access to your details to be #restricted, e.g. to protect the location of patients who may be at risk:
POSTSCRIPT: While this started as a historical ramble, it prompted an interesting reply that could address one of the big issues* of the current, deliberately difficult #GPdata opt-out process:
__
*How do I get a #receipt when my #Type1 opt-out is done?
And what relevance does this have for the #future?
Well, if you didn't already know, the Government is about to introduce legislation for its SECOND major top-down #reorganisation of the #NHS in a decade...
And at the #informational heart of that proposal - which will divide the #NHS in England into nicely-digestible chunks, called "#IntegratedCareSystems" (ICS) - lies...
But wait! I thought we already HAD something called an #SCR? 🤔
We do. It's the #SummaryCareRecord - for which we - @NO2ID, #TBOO & others - fought (and won) an opt-out in 2006 👇 and continued to campaign for until, after a few years, the #NHS and Government agreed it would be PROPERLY COMMUNICATED.
N.B. You can *still* opt out of having a #SummaryCareRecord 👇though I WOULDN'T recommend it - as your #SCR is used for your own medical care and *not* for "Research & Planning" or other 'secondary uses'.
...given - for entirely valid #healthcare reasons, early in the #pandemic - a whole bunch of "Additional Information" was added to everyone's #SCR 👇 without telling them.
Of course, now that info is in there, different groups are lobbying to keep it...
1) The #NationalDataOptOut, while it was (cack-handedly) introduced alongside #GDPR in May 2018, had in fact existed since #caredata - when it...
...was known as a #Type2 opt out - in case you were wondering about the derivation of #Type1s.
2) There was no announced date for the "expiration" of #Type1 opt-outs - certainly NOT "June 2021". There's no mention of this in the #GPDPR#DPN issued on...
And in this single statement 👇 @MattHancock demonstrates not only his profound ignorance, but his underlying thinking - that information about you is a #TradableAsset.
Who "owns" the fact of your relationship with your sister? You? Her? Or your date of birth? Your current age?
Let's not even get started on things like #genomic data (i.e. data derived from your #DNA) which says things not only about you, but your relatives. Who "owns" that?
The reason the #powerful want people to think they "own" their #PersonalData - rather than it being protected...
...by a strong, well-enforced #rights framework - is that they can #force or #fool you into surrendering it, so the data you give them becomes THEIR "#property" to #exploit.
If '#DataIsTheNewOil', as they want you to believe, then what does that make YOU?
Indeed, it says the strategic dashboard "will display ... record level pseudonymised data” and (as a data expert) you will of course know that #pseudonymised data is #personal data…
...and has been *in law*, as well as in practice, since at least May 2018.
@ICOnews published some helpful (draft) guidance just last month that can point you in the right direction if there's any confusion:
The man's either lying or he's DANGEROUSLY ignorant / ill-informed.
Hancock can't have missed that Cummings' henchman Ben, who attended SAGE, was the brother of Marc Warner (CEO of Faculty Science Ltd, formerly ASI Data Science Ltd) that built the #dashboards Matty Moo-Moos...
...so loves, on top of @PalantirTech's Foundry "#DataPlatform" (remember those words!) that @NHSEngland has contracted for another 2 YEARS, to feed data from NHSE's ever-so-untransparent #DataStore.
But let's push it further - away from the now-defunct @CamAnalytica - in the...