I'd like to talk more about the #cryptocurrency / #blockchain phenomenon, starting again with the way that the #crypto crowd once leaned very heavily into the pretence that their cryptographic thingummies had "intrinsic value" and that they were "mined" like #gold.
the big names in #cryptocurrency especially, like @Bitcoin / $BITC and @ethereum / $ETH, fuelled this nonsense by asserting that ordinary currencies, government-backed #money, was mere "fiat money" whereas the #cryptocurrencies had some nebulous "intrinsic value".
(2/x)
you'll still find a *lot* of #cryptocurrency gamblers and grifters who cling to the "fiat money" canard. search for "fiat money" on @Twitter and you'll find some amusing examples. this was part of a general #sales pitch for #cryptocurrencies as somehow being _independent_.
(3/x)
but #cryptocurrency is about as "independent" as @elonmusk / @GOP lackey @mtaibbi—and his imitation of rebellion is very much part of the same culture of faux-independence that flourishes in the lower reaches of #capitalism, especially among the fly-by-night hustlers.
(4/x)
#cryptocurrencies are a *product* of #capitalism, not a rebellion from it. the same culture of top-speed buying and selling, the same culture of #sales and #marketing deceit, the same culture of *avarice* and trying to exit the game with the largest pile, pervades #crypto.
(5/x)
and the mere fact that massive corporations all moved to capitalize on #cryptocurrency and #NFTs shows the extent to which the whole phenomenon is completely captive by #capitalism. the usual elitists are hoping to make bank on it—as they do with every #investment bubble.
(6/x)
so where's the *rebellion*? why do all the #cryptocurrency grifters who chase after @elonmusk and @saylor and other high-profile capitalists think they're rebelling against the system, when they're clearly integral to its workings? (why does @mtaibbi think he's a rebel?)
(7/x)
it's easy to write off #crypto / Matt Taibbi-style "rebellion" as a mere pose, the habitual public posture of a #business and #marketing culture that's learned to subsume all human behaviors into itself, including human #rebellion. "rebellion" is simply another *brand*.
(8/x)
but clearly the @mtaibbi / @Timcast / @DavidSacks crowd must actually *believe* that they're #rebel outsiders, at least a little bit—it's very difficult to keep up a social pose, especially in the face of nonstop jeering, unless you really do believe that you're a rebel.
(9/x)
the answer to the riddle is the *extreme* degree of social inequality and stratification that's fostered by #capitalism, which only gets worse the further up the ladder of #success you climb. it's like an exponential slope: the further up you go, the *steeper* it gets.
(10/x)
individual differences begin to seem much larger. let's say for the sake of example that @elonmusk is the 10th most powerful person in the world now (I have no idea if that's true, it's just a hypothetical). that means the 11th most powerful person is feeling very miffed.
(11/x)
we people on the pavement, who tend to have approximately zero dollars (in comparison with @elonmusk or even @mtaibbi / @lhfang#money), might look at the 11th most powerful person and say: isn't that enough? isn't that still *more* than almost anyone alive on Earth?
(12/x)
the answer to that question is "no it's never enough." to the 11th most powerful person in the world, the 10th most powerful (@elonmusk in this hypothetical example) might as well be in another galaxy—and the 11th person would willingly do lots of crimes to beat the 10th.
(13/x)
similarly, 10th place holder @elonmusk looks upwards, resentfully, at whoever the 9th most powerful person in the world is. they have the same problem that No. 11 has with him: #ElonMusk has *so much money and power* but it's still LESS than someone who seems unreachable.
hence to @mtaibbi and @ShellenbergerMD and the rest of @elonmusk's tame press corps, who are still far wealthier than most Americans but also incomparably *poorer* than #ElonMusk, their relatively mean and lowly position is sufficient to justify feelings of "rebellion".
(16/x)
and because @elonmusk is himself a relative lightweight in terms of #capitalism and #money—all the *real* money in the world lies with corporations and families that go back centuries—@mtaibbi can very easily see Musk as a rebel outsider, simply because he's small-time.
(17/x)
@mtaibbi's fulminations about #Davos2023 may seem hypocritical, for he's clinging to a corporate aristocrat to bolster his career—but Taibbi does have a point. Mr. @dick_nixon felt the same way about the "Bohemian Grove" gang, compared to whom he was a rube from nowhere.
(18/x)
European capitalists have been making and hoarding gigantic heaps of wealth since before "#capitalism" can even be said to have existed at all, and they've had plenty of time to entrench themselves deep. the @elonmusk / @mtaibbi crowd know this, and resent it greatly.
(19/x)
hence the allure of #cryptocurrency, which seemed to hold out the promise of *erasing the difference* overnight—because as with any speculative #investment during a bubble, it's possible to make a very large sum very fast, that started with a trivial amount of money.
(20/x)
again this is very much like the promise of casino #gambling: you *could* turn one poker chip into a huge pile of wealth (like in _Lola Rennt_!) in almost no time at all—with the help of Lady Fortuna, of course. #cryptocurrency's promise was exactly the same.
(21/x)
it's a false promise. the #cryptocurrency crowd was *suckered*. what really happened (overall) was that #capitalism used #crypto to draw more victims in at the bottom of the pyramid—people too poor to do other sorts of #investments could now gamble with smaller stakes.
(22/x)
that's all #cryptocurrencies have amounted to: a way of hoovering up money from a large pool of punters who had less to gamble with (and therefore more to lose by gambling.)
#capitalism *duped* you all, $BITC / $ETH / #crypto fans. I'm really sorry.
one more rumination for tonight, I think. this one is about something that's been called "contrarianism"—a word that's been coined in some attempt to describe the perplexing behavior of celebrity 'influencers', specially the more toxic ones like @mtaibbi and @mattyglesias.
(1/x)
but the behavior is probably quite general. just about *all* of the #journalist and #media figures who have some privileged access to the press and to mass audience have learned to behave in this way on @Twitter and social media: they run away from challenging questions.
(2/x)
the blue-checked "influencers" of the @LPDonovan / @StevenTDennis / @JakeSherman sort (I've picked three names almost at random) are the people who have *benefited the most* from the #Internet-ization of #journalism. social media has amplified their social privilege.
the noisemakers at all levels of the #conservative noise machine, from the august @AEI propagandists (like "race scientist" @charlesmurray) to circus sideshows like @Timcast, try to blame "woke", but...
(1/x)
that "woke" game is extremely thin by now. really it's just rebranded Red Scare nonsense. in 1950, it was Commies who were "destroying our youth" with virulent ideas that right-wing ideologues didn't like, like abstract algebra; now @mtracey and @DouthatNYT blame "woke".
(2/x)
but ask any low-level right-wing expert on "woke"—ask @realchrisrufo or @ConceptualJames what "wokeism" actually *is*—and you'll get the word "Marxism" in no time: "woke" is, in other words, nothing new at all. it's the same old paranoia about pinko Rooskies in closets.
#capitalism requires what people call "magical thinking". it requires people to believe that impossible things aren't merely *possible*, but can be done routinely, and turned into a dependable cash flow. #AI / #AGI of the @fchollet / @JeffDean sort is a perfect example.
the very name "#AGI" gives the game away: the #programming boys daydream that they've invented a "general intelligence", a universal thinking machine capable of solving literally any problem—and #capitalism is willing to gamble on that. it's just what #business wants.
(2/x)
remember that the ideal corporation in #capitalism *does nothing*. it produces nothing, it provides no service, it solves no problems for anyone not in the ownership hierarchy—because producing things *costs money* and capitalists hate all expenditures for any reason.
more #cryptocurrency talk. it seems that there may be (another) #cryptocrash developing; there's been so many of them.
to reiterate my earlier point: the allure of #cryptocurrencies is instant #money in vast volumes, and that's why $BITC and @ETH have a million copycats.
#cryptocurrency (and the related #blockchain money-making gewgaw, the #NFT) are in a sense nothing new. there have been untold millions of #investment scams and #business tricks and other shifty clever ways that at least *pretend* they can guarantee an effortless #profit.
(2/x)
this is an artifact of the extreme #wealth inequality encouraged by #capitalism: once you've got a bunch of elite capitalists *hoarding* all the #money, that means you've got big enough piles to *steal*. all get-rich-quick schemes are ultimately acts of disguised _theft_.
the central lie is that "the markets" (i.e. the sum total of all monetary transactions by all money-seeking entities in #capitalism) are the best possible mechanism for fulfilling every conceivable human need.
if it's not "on the market", then you don't really need it.
I am not a #Christian; my friend Chara (who writes at @KrisAtLarge) is Catholic—albeit a heretical one—but I am no "believer". as I've said, I tend to leave religion to others.
all the same, it's tough *not* to have opinions about #Christianity—we're inundated with it.
(1/x)
in the United States especially, right-wing politics—which infallibly promotes an extremist and hyperpoliticized form of #Christianity—pours enormous effort and money into publicizing #Christian political demands.
@GOP politics and Bible-bashing are practically the same.
(2/x)
in fact, it seems like *all* public spokespersons for Christianity in the U.S. are political figures. #Christian@GOP politicians and activists and corporate executives proudly proclaim their purpose in public office to be the promotion of "Jesus" and "faith" and "values".