He should have to present a report as to why we had to use force, and what mistake led us to this, and how we plan to prevent future similar mistakes.
And we should ask what we did with our extremely brief tactical advantage.
Every proposal for same should be greeted with similar skepticism.
We should always look for some other better solution. Particularly when obvious ones exist.
How disgusting.
Why did we do it? Was there a good reason? If so, what was it?
How could this have been prevented?
Could we have been more generous?
More welcoming to strangers in need?
Less fearful of the unknown?
Could we have risked something to save something?
Maybe the way you isolate a violent madman is by saving those he'd kill.
Maybe the way you isolate him is by making a world where he's the only violent one.
A violent madman understands bombs.
Force only when utterly necessary, and only after deliberation, and only with very specific and temporary goals, which always involve protection
Force always with a sense of failure that we couldn't avoid it
So that's a strategy
Our closed-door policy to Syrian refugees is a symptom of our bad orientation.
Hard to imagine an America with those sorts of problems