,
8 tweets,
2 min read
Read on Twitter
Does this sound like Mueller to anyone? Not to me.
(1) Mueller told Corsi he'd indict him if he didn't cut a deal.
(2) Mueller explained to Corsi both the indictment and the deal.
(3) Corsi gave Mueller the middle finger—and he did it on YouTube.
(4) Mueller didn't indict Corsi.
(1) Mueller told Corsi he'd indict him if he didn't cut a deal.
(2) Mueller explained to Corsi both the indictment and the deal.
(3) Corsi gave Mueller the middle finger—and he did it on YouTube.
(4) Mueller didn't indict Corsi.
Does this sound like Mueller to anyone? Not to me.
(1) Mueller had Flynn on lobbying and conspiracy to kidnap charges.
(2) Mueller cut a deal with Flynn—presumably to get his superiors.
(3) Flynn cooperated fully—per Mueller.
(3) Mueller indicted no one who was Flynn's superior.
(1) Mueller had Flynn on lobbying and conspiracy to kidnap charges.
(2) Mueller cut a deal with Flynn—presumably to get his superiors.
(3) Flynn cooperated fully—per Mueller.
(3) Mueller indicted no one who was Flynn's superior.
Does this sound like Mueller to anyone? Not to me.
(1) Mueller fought months to get testimony from a grand jury witness (Miller).
(2) Mueller fought months to get documents from a state-owned foreign corp.
(3) Mueller gave up without getting either the witness or the documents.
(1) Mueller fought months to get testimony from a grand jury witness (Miller).
(2) Mueller fought months to get documents from a state-owned foreign corp.
(3) Mueller gave up without getting either the witness or the documents.
Does this sound like Mueller to anyone? Not to me.
(1) Mueller is prosecuting Roger Stone in November.
(2) The facts underlying Stone's charges suggest he's a Trump-Russia link.
(3) Mueller is reporting in now—though Stone may cooperate and give him critical info for his report.
(1) Mueller is prosecuting Roger Stone in November.
(2) The facts underlying Stone's charges suggest he's a Trump-Russia link.
(3) Mueller is reporting in now—though Stone may cooperate and give him critical info for his report.
Does this sound like Mueller to anyone? Not to me.
(1) Mueller told Trump he wanted to have a sit-down interview with him.
(2) Trump said no.
(3) Evidence emerged that Trump's written answers to Mueller were false.
(4) Mueller quickly gave up on interviewing Trump face-to-face.
(1) Mueller told Trump he wanted to have a sit-down interview with him.
(2) Trump said no.
(3) Evidence emerged that Trump's written answers to Mueller were false.
(4) Mueller quickly gave up on interviewing Trump face-to-face.
Does this sound like Mueller to anyone? Not to me.
(1) Ivanka Trump is a key witness in the Mueller investigation.
(2) Mueller never interviewed her.
(3) Jared Kushner was suspected of several crimes, per media reporting.
(4) Mueller never interviewed him on any of those topics.
(1) Ivanka Trump is a key witness in the Mueller investigation.
(2) Mueller never interviewed her.
(3) Jared Kushner was suspected of several crimes, per media reporting.
(4) Mueller never interviewed him on any of those topics.
Does this sound like Mueller to anyone? Not to me.
(1) Mueller gave shady operator George Nader immunity from prosecution.
(2) Nader spent a year giving Mueller info on Russia, Saudi Arabia, and UAE.
(3) Not one indictment resulted from that year of George Nader supplying intel.
(1) Mueller gave shady operator George Nader immunity from prosecution.
(2) Nader spent a year giving Mueller info on Russia, Saudi Arabia, and UAE.
(3) Not one indictment resulted from that year of George Nader supplying intel.
My point here is that none of the noise tonight matters: what matters is that experts in this case, in law, and in criminal investigation have no earthly idea how the public speculation—that the Trump administration and Trump family dodged all bullets—could *possibly* be correct.
