#WhenTheLackOfAnswerBecomesTheAnswer
Jesus has been engaged in ministry in Galilee (14.13-15.20).
In 15.21, he ‘withdraws’ (εξερχομαι) to Tyre and Sidon.
The vb. ‘withdraw’ suggests Jesus is in search of privacy,
But Jesus does not in fact get much privacy in Tyre and Sidon.
He is instead confronted by a Canaanite woman,
who follows him around and ‘cries out’ (ptc. = sustained activity) after him.
Jesus’ response to the woman may come as a surprise to us
...or, put more precisely, because Jesus responds with silence.
But let us think more carefully about Jesus’ actions for a moment.
*Should* Jesus’ response to the Canaanite woman surprise us?
It depends on how we view him.
Think about how God responds to our prayers.
Doesn’t God often respond to our prayers in (what appears to be) silence?
Don’t we often feel as if our prayers go unanswered?
Before, then, we proceed any further with our question, let us consider a different one, viz.,
Why does God choose to answer many of our prayers with silence?
which we may not be appropriately placed to comprehend at present,
but a couple of possibilities proffer themselves.
First, to remind us of God’s sovereignty.
Prayer is not a right but a privilege,
and an immense one at that.
When God answers our prayers, he answers them out of his grace.
A world in which God immediately answered all our prayers would be one in which faith and perseverance were entirely unnecessary.
We would never need to trust in God’s wisdom,
nor would we ever need to persevere.
(Think of how our confidence in God grows when we have asked him for something for many years, and it finally arrives at just the right time.)
Jesus knows exactly how things will ultimately turn out with the Canaanite woman.
His response of silence gives opportunity and cause for her to realise Jesus is under no obligation to help her,
(Genuine faith always perseveres.)
The rest of the passage can be understood in light of the same principle.
Jesus’ continued interaction with the Canaanite woman brings her faith to full flower
Jesus’ final rebuttal also becomes the means by which the woman’s prayer is finally answered.
It is not appropriate, Jesus says, for him to take what he has come to give to Israel, God’s firstborn son,
But the woman turns Jesus’ analogy to her advantage.
‘All I need’, she says, ‘is Israel’s leftovers’--the grace which Israel has already let fall to the floor.
The woman’s words are entirely consistent with God’s redemptive plans.
i.e., the overflow of God’s mercy and providence.
Indeed, our text resonates with the book of Ruth in a number of important ways.
a] in great need,
b] moved by a desire to help her family,
c] outside of God’s covenant,
e] content to glean Israel’s leftovers, and
#NoAccentsOnMyKeyboard (Sorry @lettlander)
and hence includes her among God’s people.
In contrast to the Israelites’ faith--which should have been great but is four times referred to as ‘little’ (8.26, 14.31, 16.18, 17.20)--, the Canaanite woman’s faith is ‘great’,
since she knew very little about Jesus yet had great confidence in him.
It is not put off by the hurdles it needs to overcome.
It even leads the woman to kneel at the feet of a Jewish Messiah,
which would presumably have been seen as very undignified,
but the woman did not care.
A bad day at work? A few unanswered prayers?
The end.
P.S. Hopefully some more on Ruth some time soon...