,
3 tweets,
1 min read
Read on Twitter
Are you... OK? I'm asking seriously.
You're a former DoD intelligence officer who notes prominently in your Twitter bio that you're on the Advisory Board for the Trump 2020 presidential campaign. You're commenting on a book filled with major-media reports on counterintelligence.
You're a former DoD intelligence officer who notes prominently in your Twitter bio that you're on the Advisory Board for the Trump 2020 presidential campaign. You're commenting on a book filled with major-media reports on counterintelligence.
2/ Someone clearly misinformed you on the book you're attacking, letting you speak for the campaign when doing so is bad for your—and the *campaign's*—reputation. PROOF OF CONSPIRACY is a curation of major-media investigative reports from around the world—it contains no "theory."
3/ PROOF OF CONSPIRACY is a 970-page report with 3,250 endnotes and 4,330 citations—all taken from investigative reporting by the most august media outlets in the world. It literally isn't a work of opinion or theory; you won't find any errors in it. So I'd rethink your strategy.
