c/o @manjusrii
+ longer read of the issue c/o @not_my_debt:
notmydebt.com.au/the-issue
Podcast = future, but #robodebt began in 2016.
Interviewed: @ruchowdh, @kevindeliban, @WNicholsonPrice and @ShobitaP all talking about the future of holding algorithms accountable.
"The [Human Services] Department's conduct is abysmal"
"Imagine if banks were issuing hundreds of thousands of false debts against their customers and expecting customers to prove them wrong or pay up."
With #robodebt now, over 2000 deaths: abc.net.au/triplej/progra…
Govt minister: "There's no link, people die". Nice try.
thesaturdaypaper.com.au/2019/03/02/rob…
RHYS Cauzzo, 28, took his own life after being hounded by debt collectors: news.com.au/finance/money/…
Santos has to defend the coders of the algorithm: "The system placed her in a low priority group because they calculated, accurately..." Summary: $ + resources.
With #robodebt, it's built to be inaccurate. More on that later...
Ava, you just summarised #robodebt.
Robert Skinner explains the maths:
"First, draw a picture of a rabbit with half its brain missing. Now imagine that you are being audited by the rabbit."
themonthly.com.au/issue/2019/aug…
Once again, spot on, Ava. Here's the twist:
theguardian.com/australia-news…
Why? Because "Coalition needs to include over 65s and other disadvantaged welfare recipients to hit $600m budget plan"
With #robodebt, you get a letter, indicating you have a debt, with no justification as to how.
- Isn't it our fault, for choosing this hospital?
- The hospital failed in their duty because of this algorithm.
Replace hospital with australian government, and you have #robodebt.
"An algorithm is basically just a set of rules".
But what happens when something goes wrong?
The downside?
"The algorithm has been gone, and the state has since switched to a new system. They won’t use the word algorithm to describe the new system. "
Kevin: The algorithm issue was just an easy and convenient way to cut spending that comes in this veneer of being objective, and rational, and not subject to any sort of human biases.
We'd like to congratulate Rowan on her success in court yesterday:
"We cannot accept a system that is so clearly flawed and causing overwhelming hardship to the most disadvantaged people in our community," she said.
"It is important that a court looks at the lawfulness of the process Centrelink relies on to decide that people owe them money."
Hells yes, because this process is *seriously flawed*.
Disclaimer: haven't had a #robodebt, but my take on the process is:
An example:
Centrelink *love* making you call them.
smh.com.au/politics/feder…
(I may have things out of order here re: letters and phonecalls, but the basic gist is, you're in a hamster wheel with compliance + phonecalls)
Whilst centrelink want you to know that they care:
twitter.com/search?f=top&q…
Here's how much they care:
theguardian.com/australia-news…
We know that centrelink keeps very quiet about another part of the process if you have a #robodebt, where people can get their money back.
Authorised Review.
legalaid.vic.gov.au/find-legal-ans…
Major, major, change:
(My hideous maths might be out a bit, but basically speaking, pay a #robodebt without a review = being scammed).
As a layperson, what I completely fail to understand is how #robodebt has been going on for so long. If you go into a store, and steal $10,000 of goods, the cops are onto you.
However, if you're the government:
(75% of the average debt = $1702 x 500,000).
@Asher_Wolf (great legal thread: )
@DarrenODonovan ( )
@jpwarren:
@QcSilbert :
@not_my_debt:
I do wonder: What have we learnt from #robodebt ?
How do we ensure that this never happens again?
Thanks to @roseveleth for starting the conversation around algorithms.