1/ I highly recommend reading Glen's threads (plural) and all the conversations. You'll learn something about the science and/or how to communicate.
Most people though, having read the conversations, would still have questions.
(I'd like more on how it's an ecological crisis.)
Most people though, having read the conversations, would still have questions.
(I'd like more on how it's an ecological crisis.)
2/ Glen, you replied so patiently to blunt challenging of your explanations, and you perhaps would like a break now! But if you have the time/inclination, could you sum up your thoughts on how best to discuss slow/fast feedbacks in relation to zero emissions for clarity. I find
3/ this to be exceedingly challenging, probably because there is genuine debate on how feedbacks work.
I tend to allow my brain to go towards a "oh god, feedbacks will kill everything when we consider all aspects of the ecological crisis", but I try hard to keep an open mind as
I tend to allow my brain to go towards a "oh god, feedbacks will kill everything when we consider all aspects of the ecological crisis", but I try hard to keep an open mind as
4/ the whole picture is so complex. The state of the Arctic and the Cryosphere in general, tropical tainforests, ocean heat etc give me the sense that we're heading over 2C towards 3C - 5C, but I'm determined to be clear and avoid mistakes and ti keep reflecting on communication.
Thanks @Peters_Glen!
