In every day speech they are called ‘Terror Attacks’.
They are actually Islamist attacks.
They are evidence of a fifth column within our ranks, who are open about their desire to kill us.
They are actually Islamist attacks.
They are evidence of a fifth column within our ranks, who are open about their desire to kill us.
They are also evidence of a liberal, chattering class that behaves like a diseased animal in its fawning collaboration with these supremacist murderers.
True to form, the political, chattering class has been telling us not to look back in anger, not to allow ‘populists’ to win, not to allow ‘hate’ to divide us.
The Guardian is desperately trying to make us believe that it our response to this atrocity that is the problem:
The Guardian is desperately trying to make us believe that it our response to this atrocity that is the problem:
What this attack shows that it is their reckless, fawning, liberalism which has failed, not us and our ‘populism’.
Usman Khan was a convicted terrorist.
He should have been in jail. Indefinitely. Interned.
He should have been in jail. Indefinitely. Interned.
Lord Levenson and two other judges decided to release him.
He has human rights, you see - human rights that were invented by the Christian European culture that Usman and his ‘Brothers’ so despise.
He has human rights, you see - human rights that were invented by the Christian European culture that Usman and his ‘Brothers’ so despise.
I’m guessing that Lord Levenson dosn't live in areas where released Jihadis like Usman roam.
I’m guessing his kids don’t go to school with those of people like Usman.
I’m guessing he doesn’t have to worry about their ‘white whore’ daughters being around men like Usman.
I’m guessing his kids don’t go to school with those of people like Usman.
I’m guessing he doesn’t have to worry about their ‘white whore’ daughters being around men like Usman.
Whist in jail, money was wasted on de-radicalisation programmes.
That this didn’t work won’t surprise anyone who understands that the problem is not radicalisation but Islamisation.
That this didn’t work won’t surprise anyone who understands that the problem is not radicalisation but Islamisation.
Upon his release, more time and money was wasted when Usman was sent on rehabilitation programmes.
He was actually attending a rehabilitation conference on the day he went on his murderous rampage.
He was actually attending a rehabilitation conference on the day he went on his murderous rampage.
A rehabilitation conference staffed by naïve young people like Jack Merritt and Saskia Jones, both of them now dead, stabbed to death by a man they erroneously believed was a lost soul, rather than the violent, Muslim supremacist Usman had clearly shown himself to be.
These tweets by Jack’s father read like a macabre comedy:
The reckless, nihilistic, virtue-signalling on display in these tweets is very familiar to me.
I was raised amongst international aid workers. They all had this pathology.
A pathology that sees them prioritise those who harm and murder their children.
I was raised amongst international aid workers. They all had this pathology.
A pathology that sees them prioritise those who harm and murder their children.
This is not how normal, healthy mammals behave.
We are a species that is supposed to protect our young, defend our nests, patrol our territory.
We are a species that is supposed to protect our young, defend our nests, patrol our territory.
I don’t care if Jack’s father doesn’t want us nasty right-wingers to ‘exploit’ his son’s murder.
I’ll tell him to his face that his weak and irresponsible collaboration with this nonsense has helped create the conditions for his death.
I’ll tell him to his face that his weak and irresponsible collaboration with this nonsense has helped create the conditions for his death.
Jack’s University thesis looked at the ‘over-representation’ of ‘minorities’ in the prison system.
‘Over-representation’ is a concept straight out of Cultural Marxism.
It is as meaningless as the concept of ‘Islamophobia’.
‘Over-representation’ is a concept straight out of Cultural Marxism.
It is as meaningless as the concept of ‘Islamophobia’.
It argues that the key reason why ‘minorities’ are ‘over-represented’ in criminal activities is because evil oppressors – the privileged, white people, colonisers – keep them down.
It doesn’t distinguish.
It doesn’t look at why it’s Muslim and Caribbean men who are ‘over-represented’ and question what it might be about these men’s cultures and backgrounds that lead them to crime.
It doesn’t look at why it’s Muslim and Caribbean men who are ‘over-represented’ and question what it might be about these men’s cultures and backgrounds that lead them to crime.
It doesn’t consider why other ‘minorities’ - Hindus, Sikhs, East Asians, African Christians - are not ‘over-represented’.
It just looks at the oppressors hate - hate being defined as any criticism of any minority behaviour or ideology whatsoever.
It just looks at the oppressors hate - hate being defined as any criticism of any minority behaviour or ideology whatsoever.
Where there is real ‘hate’, Cultural Marxism doesn’t just look away, it enables and collaborates with it, shields it, looks to rehabilitate it.
It unleashes the Inquisition on heretics.
It unleashes the Inquisition on heretics.
What it takes to stop real hate is what we saw in London last Friday.
Other men, brave men, who are prepared to take on the Jihadi on his own terms - violently.
Other men, brave men, who are prepared to take on the Jihadi on his own terms - violently.
The Cultural Marxists have been somewhat silent in their usual demonisation of straight, white men and toxic masculinity in the face of this bravery.
It requires a state prepared to kill any Barbarian found inside the gate.
Seeing the police not hesitate to shoot Usman dead was a sight for sore eyes.
Seeing the police not hesitate to shoot Usman dead was a sight for sore eyes.
It requires an acceptance that real hate does, indeed, exist and that the fight must be brought to it.
Former Navy Seal Commander @jockowillink puts it more bluntly:
“There is evil. The way you get rid of people like that is you kill them. You hunt them down + you kill them.”
Former Navy Seal Commander @jockowillink puts it more bluntly:
“There is evil. The way you get rid of people like that is you kill them. You hunt them down + you kill them.”
@jockowillink We are not at war with terrorism, we are being attacked and subverted by an ideology that has harmed us numerous times in the past and would transform every aspect of our civilisation if it could.
@jockowillink DO look back in anger.
Do challenge the quisling rhetoric of the political class.
Hold the line and stay angry.
Do challenge the quisling rhetoric of the political class.
Hold the line and stay angry.
