Meeting the challenge of climate emergency will pretty obviously invigorate the economy.
McConnell's not protecting the economy. He's stalling while his friends loot the safe.
But beyond that, the idea that spending trillions of dollars on R&D and infrastructure aimed toward a solution to a real problem will *depress* the economy?
(Also billions of humans are going to suffer and die, but, hey! People who only care about money apparently: what we're doing is economically *insane.*)
(also billions of humans, if that moves the needle for you)
The economic value here is practically infinite.
Those fighting it are either impossibly dumb, or are looting the safe.
How would an uninhabitable planet affect YOY growth in the energy sector?
What's the economic price of letting other countries capture the future of the economy, if there is to be one?
Are economic questions I have.