Now that it's clear there was no "imminent" threat or "immanent" threat, Trump's new legal argument is that the US took Soleimani by "eminent" domain?
Here's a discussion of "immanent" threat, with apologies to @atrupar (a misspelling was an excuse for a bad theology joke).
And h/t @joshchafetz
And h/t @joshchafetz
@atrupar @joshchafetz Trump deleted his tweet. I guess an advisor's correction was imminent. (And Trump hadn't read any briefing on "imminence.")
But his "corrected" tweet here is classic:
"The answer to both is a strong YES."
Both?
He means it was both imminent and not imminent?
But his "corrected" tweet here is classic:
"The answer to both is a strong YES."
Both?
He means it was both imminent and not imminent?
