Months later, The Hill is *STILL* reviewing John Solomon's work. The outlet's editor-in-chief told me there's no "exact timetable" for completing it, but that it will be finished in the "near future." It's unusual for a review like this to take so long. cnn.com/2020/01/23/med…
Solomon's work really constitutes the underpinnings of the Republican defense of Trump (that Biden misused his office, was corrupt, etc). It would matter a lot more if The Hill issued corrections to Solomon's work before the trial ends, versus after impeachment has concluded.
It's unclear why months after the review was announced, The Hill has yet to complete it. People w/1st-hand knowledge of relevant events have disputed Solomon's work ON THE RECORD in testimony TO CONGRESS.
But The Hill says the "review continues with a collective intensity..."
But The Hill says the "review continues with a collective intensity..."
