1. @RTErdogan officially came w/ a “peacekeeping” mission, but no illusions in #Moscow of waht kinda olive branch he carries.
3 goals:
a) insert #Turkey in conflict to expand regional influence
b) sell more arms
c) access #Ukraine's tech market
2. #Turkey has arms to offer which #Ukraine needs – good overlap of interests here.
Bayraktars are what everyone focusesd on (+ #Ukraine built a plant to service them) but UKR interested in expanding the drone lineup,so it’s the Akinci drone that the parties may be discussing +..
3. +... joint coproduction of other arms on #Ukraine's territory. #Turkey also needs accessories for their own weapons. Since has sought to diversify from #West/ern producers – recently with South Koreans - #Ukraine is a good palce to look at.
4. #Ukraine has a decent engineering school, (the remnants of the Soviet legacy which they now say was a curse) which #Turkey would benefit from. Ankara also allegedly has ambitions to buy "Motor Sich” JSC one of the largest engine manufacturers.
5. In 2020, #US pressured #Ukraine into refusing #China to buy the company,but allowing the sale to #Turkey 'd make sense from US standpoint & 'd satisfy all parties – except #Russia (but I guess that’s the idea). Ze & Erdo allegedly discussed the plans in one of earlier meetings
6. Finally, the #Crimea/n #Tatars aspect is there and it’s the political resource & leverage that #Turkey is always happy to work, but it falls into the first category – expanding political influence in the region.
7. What does #Russia think of all of this?
a. #Moscow gets the game that #Erdogan is playing but #Putin continues to stick to his philosophy that as long as he gets the game, Erdogan is “under control”.Needless to panic or escalate rels with Turkey over this – what’s it gonna do?
While greeting UKR forces earlier today #Erdogan shouted "Hail to #Ukraine!" No protocol requires that he shoulda done it, but it's seen as to tease #Moscow and this was well-noted.. no need to react.. at least not now.
8.b.The weapons #Turkey might supply to #Ukraine wouldn’t be a decisive factor should a war break out - the drone stuff been studied carefully by RU military in #Syria, #Karabakh,#Libya,Donbass.That the locals can’t deter it, doesn’t mean RU can’t deter it,if push comes to shove
9.BUT since major war unlikely, #Ukraine won’t even need to use it (at least not against #Russia), but might in some time resell it to someone.
UKR has a record of re-selling foreign arms to warlords / conflict zones, so I'd not be surprised to see it somewhere in MidEast shortly
10.Erdogan's effort to insert TUR into conflict – which partially worked in Karabakh (not the way TUR planned) will unlikely work in #Ukraine. #Russia only interested in #US.
BUT #Putin agreed to visit TUR after Olympics so TUR may not be entirely irrelevant to RU in this crisis
🔥⚡️Deputy Chairman of Foreign Affairs Commiitee of the #Russia/n Council of Federation (Senate): #US response to Russian security proposals does not satisfy #Moscow. RUS will prepare its own response within days & it will be prepared in consulations w/ partners including #China
Meanwhile,27 #Russia/n diplomats @RusEmbUSA are leaving #US today (28 more expected to leave during summer) upon #US decision
Amb.Antonov said @StateDept "made it clear that he himself would also have to leave by April if RUS fails to give visas to guards of US embassy in Moscow"
Top it off with the latest news that the investigation into the terrorist attack on board of a city bus in Voronezh in August 2021 (that killed 2 and left many wounded) discovered it might have been perpetrated by #Ukrainian special ops unit.. vesti.ru/article/2668791
#Lavrov on talks with @ABlinken: #US sought to put #Ukraine at the top of the negotiations agenda, but it seemed to me that at the end of th meeting they realized we'd eventually have to focus on the substance of [#Russia's] security proposals
#Lavrov on the meeting with @ABlinken: We believe that publicizing #US response to #Russia's security proposals would be a right thing to do, I'd ask Secretary #Blinken that we should do it
This is the key point that pundits,media,politicians in #US/#EU are missing about the situation w/ #Russia. It is not about #Ukraine or European security order/architecture. It's about #Russia's own security guarantees which #Moscow intends to ensure for itself with or w/out US
1. The talks went, by and large, as #Russia/n party expected it to go:
a) #US took most RUS proposals seriously, elaborated thru them;
b) US sought to tie RUS proposals to issues of strategic stability & missile deployments
c) US sought to make it “protracted negotiation process”
2.#Russia made clear it wasn’t interested in linking strat stability conversation to security guarantees conversation – at least in the way the #US wants it.
Ryabkov: “Legal guarantees on the issue of @NATO non-(further)expansion are of the prime significance for Russia”
1/ Eurasian politics can be interesting:
Over the past 3 days the country that seemed the strongest in #CentralAsia almost turned into a failed state. #Putin sent troops to prop up the ruler who endorsed "multi-vector" foreign policy...
2/ ..and the decision had to be pronounced by #Armenia/n PM who himself came to power thru protests and who refused to turn to CSTO at the time his army was losing to #Azerbaijan
Serious clashes between protestors and law enforcement on the streets of Almaty, unconfirmed reports suggest 8 law enforcement killed, many wounded #KazakhstanProtests #Kazakhstan
Mob captures and beats up a law enforcement officer
In another episode, a policeman was surrounded and the mob took away his gun. For some reason other policemen did nothing
I read the title & thought #US was just playing fool.Then I watched @CNN asking abt "#Putin's motives for invading #Ukraine" & heard the answers such as "further dispution of #NATO" & "..constantly testing the West".
I know see why the "blind spot" edition.cnn.com/2021/11/15/pol…
Seriously thou, there're some Russia experts in #Washington who read #Russia well. There're not many but enought to draw on their expetise to make accurate policies. The intel "blind spot" isn't cuz of lack of info or access to #Putin's closed circle...
..It's abt political will to correct the course of action,resists lobbysts & political inertia.
There was no lack of intel on #Afghanistan - thou assessments divereged.There's no lack of intel on RUS,either understanding of why Putin may be inclined to use force...