Thread by @frodofied

THE @nytimes HAS BEEN INFILTRATED BY RUSSIA

That's my headline.

The evidence for this claim is circumstantial but in sufficient enough quantity to seem more than that.

And I feel as remorseful tweeting this as they ever did while printing Clinton stories they knew were false.

The fact that during the election the @nytimes played the role of Witch Hunter in Chief, and nearly unapologetically, coupled with their constant & nauseating attempts to normalize Trump's illegitmate fascist regime makes my headline more probable than possible in my opinion.

While members of the media trip over themselves to vouch for @maggieNYT and others at the Times, these writers continue to churn out material that could best be described as drivel or even propaganda at times.

Haberman particularly throws herself into a suspect light for her nearly immediate blocking of anyone defending Clinton or questioning her conclusions.

I was blocked for pointing out that in an article about @HumaAbedin the writer had admitted no wrong doing by Abedin in one

paragraph only to suggest possible guilt in the next which is just the worst kind of journalism, and one that had been applied continually to Clinton's by Haberman and many others. All conveying the idea of "just because it can't be proven with facts doesn't mean it's not true."

Here are the tweets that earned my block, you be the judge.

External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @frodofied view original on Twitter

Tweet two:

External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @frodofied view original on Twitter

This happened over and over to Clinton supporters who responded to Haberman. It became something of a joke as the trend progressed.

I don't find it funny anymore.

But Haberman is not an isolated case. The problems at the Times run deep & include other writers & editorial staff.

Critics of this thread will rightly point out that most of my claims are based assumptions derived from circumstantial evidence.

Yes, they are.

But I'm not a journalist. I'm a guy on Twitter trying to help save this country. And I try to use this platform responsibly.

When I overreach I generally acknowledge so, which undoubtedly makes me a far more reliable source on any given day than many of the writers & much of the work coming out of the @nytimes.

If you've not cancelled the @nytimes I encourage you to do so. Wapo is where it's at.