nytimes.com/2017/12/02/us/… (@nytmike @SharonLNYT @ScottShaneNYT reporting)
Conspiracy to suborn perjury.
I wrote about it:
justsecurity.org/51399/cover-li…
Priebus, McGahn create 6-page memo which close observers know is FALSE. Memo is fiction saying Flynn lied to Trump team about Russia call. (Priebus himself was told of Rus sanction call in Dec '16 per McFarland email.)
So, the question there is: Did Priebus and McGahn know that their false memo would be used to inform/try to mislead the federal investigators?
Here's #WoodwardBook excerpt:
A Q is date, time of her second FBI interview.
WaPo says was "not long after Flynn’s plea." But was it before NYT report with leaked emails? Did she continue to lie not knowing emails would be released?
That's a joke
Plus WaPo has McFarland on record saying re Flynn call's details: “It sticks in my mind"
Truth: She was at M-L with transition team and they were in on it.
"Ms. McFarland, what did you mean in your email to other transition officials in Dec. '16 when you wrote, 'Trump will have difficulty improving relations with Russia, which has just thrown U.S.A. election to him.'”?
• obstruction of justice (whether there was a coordinated effort to lie to federal investigators)
• the heart of the Trump-Russia investigation itself (why do you think they were lying?)
<end>