NYT's in-depth prosecution of #Israel. Only deep in article do we read:
"Three medics down, all from one bullet. It seemed improbable. But The Times’s reconstruction confirmed nyti.ms/2RmANCJ
Not a directed, intentional murder by sniper.
Not since Warren Commission on JFK's assassination have I seen such research, stopped frames, diagrams.
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Dvp9aREX4AAjsgM.jpg)
Rouzan al-Najjar, the brave woman medic, was not in Hamas, but she was used by Hamas before, during, and after her tragic, non-intentional death.
Hamas' cannon fodder.
END
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Dvp_bHLWsAAmTlF.jpg)
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Dvp_g33WsAAUEBG.jpg)
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Dvp_jeiX0AAmNwC.jpg)
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DvqMaNAW0AAHUnR.jpg)
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DvqMdgrWoAE4nbF.jpg)
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DvqNM-aXgAAh40k.jpg)
Why so dogged? nyti.ms/2GLsOuJ
"Though Israel claims Rouzan’s killing was unintentional, our investigation shows that her shooting appears to have been reckless..."
NYT admits it had an agenda: "We spoke with NGOs & experts in international law to assess whether the shooting may have constituted a war crime."
No allowance for Muslim's Friday, Jewish Shabbat? Nah.