Let's look at the last 10 days or so - merely a snapshot
As can be seen again and again, there appear to be different rules for allies of the leadership when facing allegations of antisemitism.
How do we know this?
The Macpherson report described it as the “collective failure of an organisation to provide an appropriate and professional service to people because of their colour, culture, or ethnic origin”.
Open and adequate recognition of the problem.
You can read the 11 questions which Jennie Formby refused to answer in this thread.
They are hugely problematic. Far left Jews are entitled to a voice in the party, but McDonnell's open support for them demonstrates how deep into the ecosystem of denial he is
Three of these I'm afraid🤔🤔🤔
The *chair*
Of the Constituency Labour Party that tried to deselect Luciana Berger
These aren't peripheral racists, they are right there in the centre
The chair!
a real, pernicious influence in the Labour movement
Victimisation is a legal term (legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15/…) which means someone is treated less well because they have complained about discrimination.
A clear sign of institutional discrimination is when institutional power is used in this way
In July, two MPs, @margarethodge and @IanAustinMP, accused Jeremy Corbyn of racism and antisemitism. Labour instantly launched disciplinary proceedings against both
Amazingly, it took 3 months for the proceedings against Austin to be dropped (politicshome.com/news/uk/politi…)
Plainly, there was nothing in these charges otherwise the party wouldn't have dropped them
That's victimisation plain and simple.
And the excuse that Hodge swore at Corbyn cannot stand as the case was dropped.
For an institution to properly handle complaints of discrimination it must have an effective grievance and disciplinary process.
That applies to political parties as much as it does to the workplace
Ineffective, opaque, poorly resourced, undermined by political interference.
The Home Affairs Committee said in its 2016 report on antisemitism that Labour must “address a severe lack of transparency within the Party’s disciplinary process”.
Almost none have been taken up
bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politi…
Let's meet a few of them
Peter Willsman, NEC member, was recorded saying of 68 rabbis that he was“not going to be lectured to by Trump fanatics making up duff information without any evidence at all”
theguardian.com/politics/2018/…
He referred to some complaints as “imagined”.
There is "nothing Jeremy can do that will ever satisfy people who come up with this stuff"
People are entitled to their views but imagine if you were bringing a sex discrimination complaint at work and you knew that one of the people who would finally determine it had made these kind of comments
The Chair of the whole thing
She resigned after a newspaper expose showing that she opposed the suspension of a council candidate who posted a range of antisemitic material on Facebook.
theguardian.com/politics/2018/…
- Senior figure caught attempting to minimise antisemitism and manipulate processes. Bang to rights.
- Denies wrongdoing, shows no insight whatsoever, goes down fighting
- People still defend her and Alan Ball to this day
"such attitudes can thrive in a tightly knit community, so that there can be a collective failure to detect and to outlaw this breed of racism."
The report is here - chap 6 is the key one assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl…
Good on what a proper and good faith institutional response would *actually look like* (compare what we actually see happening) thejc.com/comment/column…
- We don't know if investigations are being conducted properly without political interference
- Good to hear that the NCC is a "quasi judicial body" but what about the filter to the NCC, where the vast majority of cases fall away?
I have focussed on fair processes - important. But as anyone who has worked in an org/company knows, it can have the best processes but terrible culture.
I think Labour has developed a poor culture which disadvantages Jewish people
Sir Robert Frances was v interested in organisational culture. There are parallels here.
This means an institution must be careful to treat complaints sensitively and at face value.
And treat that as the starting point for an effective investigation
This is what has happened in the Labour Party
Dianne Abbot has said it is “a smear to say that Labour has a problem with antisemitism”. theguardian.com/politics/2016/…
There's plenty more with him, but the point isn't that he's on the extreme denial side, but that he seems to be tolerated and never faces consequences
That's culture.
politicshome.com/news/uk/social…
A ecosystem of victimisation has developed, from hugely popular Facebook groups to the ’alt left’ media such as Sqwawkbox and The Canary
Some of the stuff they publish is outrageous victimisation and conspiracism
An org with a positive anti-racism culture would disown them instantly
In the party of Jo Cox it's just unbelievable. I find it the most depressing single example of this entire affair
It goes way beyond the range of reasonable politics, even over passionate issues.
It's hatred dressed up as politics. I don't know if it comes out of the SWP-type factions that now control the party but it's toxic
e.g.
Plainly this goes beyond politics as usual.
What can be done? Macpherson said policy, example and leadership
But the example which has been set is really tacit endorsement
On to education next!
There were 673 complaints against Labour members. 146 were given warnings of conduct, which I guess means that they were found to have done something wrong but not serious enough to be referred to the NCC
thejc.com/news/uk-news/l…