, 10 tweets, 5 min read Read on Twitter
1/ Don't misinterpret this as suggesting that a 60-65% market loss is typical for a bear market. Not at all. It would be the steepest decline since the Depression.
hussmanfunds.com/comment/mc1905…
2/ The problem is that valuation metrics best correlated with *actual subsequent* full-cycle & long-term returns are just as elevated today as they were in 1929 and 2000. The Depression was basically TWO back-to-back 65% losses. The FIRST of those simply restored valuation norms.
3/ The fact is that even a brief return to historically run-of-the-mill valuation norms (or somewhat below, as we saw in 2007-2009) can wipe out years, or even decades of equity total returns, relative to T-bills.
4/ The thing that makes valuations easy to dismiss is that they can be utterly useless over extended segments of the market cycle. That's why it's critical to gauge speculative psychology w/ market internals. My biggest error in recent years was not taking that lesson far enough.
5/ While hypervaluation can be dismissed for extended periods, one needs the absence of ANY episode of risk-aversion to sustain them. Even Fed effectiveness is conditional. Investors may not recall that the Fed eased persistently the whole way down in 2000-02 and 2007-09.
6/ Over the complete cycle, even a brief return from hypervaluation to historically run-of-the-mill norms (not even undervaluation) can wipe out years, and even decades of equity total returns, relative to T-bills.
7/ While it may seem preposterous to suggest that current valuations exceed those at the 2000 peak, it's important to recognize how concentrated the hypervaluation in 2000 was in a single decile of stocks - generally large-cap glamour stocks.
8/ And that valuation skew was why I projected an -83% loss in tech stocks over the completion of the cycle. As it happened, that was the loss in the tech-heavy Nasdaq 100 by '02. Again, the reversion of hypervaluation to run-of-the-mill norms can be brutal over the full cycle.
9/ For the moment, despite hypervaluation, there are enough cross-currents that it still seems best for automatic safety nets and hard-negative views to kick in a bit lower than current levels. Investors remain keen to embrace narratives and it's best to allow for steep whipsaws.
10/ Still, as @HowardMarksBook has often emphasized, it's essential to recognize where one is in the market cycle, even if short-term speculative pressures temporarily defer the consequences. At present, our estimate for a conventional 60/30/10 mix is near the lowest in history.
Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.

Like this thread? Get email updates or save it to PDF!

Subscribe to John P. Hussman
Profile picture

Get real-time email alerts when new unrolls are available from this author!

This content may be removed anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!