,
23 tweets,
8 min read
Read on Twitter
There are many here who think atrocity literature isn't real. However, here we have yet another piece in MSM. 
😏 Some alt-naxal/ lutyen's rejects contend removing traditions & what all makes Hinduism, it will make it acceptable to everyone. Nope.
Modi sarkar let Shani Shingnapur and Sabarimala get defiled, and still it's not enough.
Modi sarkar let Shani Shingnapur and Sabarimala get defiled, and still it's not enough.
Ideal way to interpret that verse is that there are 4 groups of people, & each have their own role to play in a society, like various body parts of a human. The verse gets twisted out of shape to suit various narratives, in order to attack Hindu social structures by our enemies.
There is nothing casteist about attacking brahmins because of their jati/ varna. /s 🙄
When Abrahamics attacked a civilisation, the first thing they did was to attack priestly classes. Without priestly classes a civilisation loses its roots & its identity.
When Abrahamics attacked a civilisation, the first thing they did was to attack priestly classes. Without priestly classes a civilisation loses its roots & its identity.
One must always see such a discourse in that light. It is but an attack on the roots of our civilisation, i.e. traditions & their keepers. Obviously there will be those who will like to live in denial.
Teach a population to hate itself, and make them fight each other, then you don't exactly have to wage a war to win. They will dismantle themselves, and be ready to be culled.
This is a loaded statement with little or nothing to back it up. Brahmins are politically speaking, an easy target, as can be seen here. Could you imagine author saying something similar about other jatis without getting into legal hot-water?
Note, section has nothing to do with "history" or sacred thread.
People yearn for order. Societies organising themselves are best seen as extension of that will of the people. Sanskritisation is best seen as a pejorative to describe the desire of Indic people to seek such order.
People yearn for order. Societies organising themselves are best seen as extension of that will of the people. Sanskritisation is best seen as a pejorative to describe the desire of Indic people to seek such order.
Shastras impose many restrictions on dvijas, which includes and is not limited to food, alcohol, and many, many others. Progressively there are fewer restrictions imposed on other jatis, but that won't be highlighted in such articles, or by any other grievance monger.
Yes, without going through the rites/ initiation, one can't perform most rituals, so it's not an exaggeration in the slightest.
Many brahmanas have kul-devi/ devta temples which are officiated by those from other jatis. This is something which most commentators targeting brahmanas conveniently ignore to mention. Afterall, it wouldn't serve the narrative.
Furthermore, shastras impose no restrictions on other jatis to start their own temples, with their own rules/ traditions. It is but a convenient way to justify attacks on existing temples, and i would say, the intent behind such is questionable at best, and heinous to be blunt.
One of the routine arguments that one sees made with respect to temples, it is justification to pilfer a temple's wealth/ assets. Many suggest that all assets should be redistributed amongst people. Leaving little to no doubts about intentions of those speaking in favour of such.
The anti-temple rhetoric, it is largely based in anti-brahmin narrative. People project the temples to be part of greater evil, so it is easy to justify any and all attacks on temples and the traditions.
Pics sourced from thread of an exchange between Ghora & @zeneraalstuff 🙏
If you don't follow them as yet, do so.
If you don't follow them as yet, do so.
Another thread by Ghora.
Brahminism/ brahmanvaad is but the name of the game, Under its ambit you would see attack on temples, traditions and even the brahmin community itself.
FWIW, separatist movements in NE fuelled by church and other christian organisations has been going on for several decades. Same is true of separatist movements in Kashmir, where Islamic ideology is reason and they even associate with ISIS.
Obviously it's all due to brahmins. 🙄
Obviously it's all due to brahmins. 🙄
1 - It was and is Hinduphobic.
2 - Congress is a joke.
3 - At a very basic level, all you leave behind is your genes. So no matter which jati, one should take pride in their heritage.
2 - Congress is a joke.
3 - At a very basic level, all you leave behind is your genes. So no matter which jati, one should take pride in their heritage.
Once again, what massacre has it caused? The genocide of pandits(brahmins) in Kashmir? The ethnic cleansing of tribals in NE India who refused to convert to Christianity?
A pointless word salad, with the garnish of appeal to emotion.
😑
Link to the article.
archive.fo/IFKhe
archive.fo/IFKhe
