,
10 tweets,
4 min read
Read on Twitter
Here is The Evidence that VOTES WERE CHANGED in swing states in 2016 to make Trump president.
U.S. 2016 Unadjusted Exit Poll Discrepancies Fit Chronic Republican Vote-Count Rigging, not Random Statistical, Patterns /1
google.com/amp/s/www.rese…
U.S. 2016 Unadjusted Exit Poll Discrepancies Fit Chronic Republican Vote-Count Rigging, not Random Statistical, Patterns /1
google.com/amp/s/www.rese…
VOTES WERE CHANGED /2
Exit Polls tell us Official Tallies are Fraudulent.
“U.S. 2016 general election unadjusted exit poll (UEP) analysis finds that it is nearly impossible to think of a plausible statistical, or innocent exit poll error, rationale for the one-sided “red shift”..
Exit Polls tell us Official Tallies are Fraudulent.
“U.S. 2016 general election unadjusted exit poll (UEP) analysis finds that it is nearly impossible to think of a plausible statistical, or innocent exit poll error, rationale for the one-sided “red shift”..
VOTES WERE CHANGED /3
“.. with the most highly significant discrepancies occurring in key battle ground &deep-red states...These repeated patterns of exit poll discrepancies with official vote counts are in practice, statistically impossible, but highly politically consistent.”
“.. with the most highly significant discrepancies occurring in key battle ground &deep-red states...These repeated patterns of exit poll discrepancies with official vote counts are in practice, statistically impossible, but highly politically consistent.”
VOTES WERE CHANGED /4
..in Figure 3 Clinton’s reported PA VC of 47.6% is below the lower end of the CI, showing a statistically significant VC discrepancy with her UEP that would be expected to occur by chance only 1.1282% of the time, or less than a 1 in 88 chance..”
..in Figure 3 Clinton’s reported PA VC of 47.6% is below the lower end of the CI, showing a statistically significant VC discrepancy with her UEP that would be expected to occur by chance only 1.1282% of the time, or less than a 1 in 88 chance..”
VOTES WERE CHANGED /5
“..As shown in Figure 5 Trump’s reported WI VC of 47.9% is above the upper end of the CI, showing a statistically significant VC discrepancy with his UEP that would be expected to occur by chance only 0.1168% of the time, or less than a 1 in 856 chance..”
“..As shown in Figure 5 Trump’s reported WI VC of 47.9% is above the upper end of the CI, showing a statistically significant VC discrepancy with his UEP that would be expected to occur by chance only 0.1168% of the time, or less than a 1 in 856 chance..”
VOTES WERE CHANGED /6
“.. As shown in Figure 6 Trump’s reported NC VC of 47.9% is above the upper end of the CI,showing a statistically significant VC discrepancy with his UEP that would be expected to occur by chance only 0.0051% of the time, or less than a 1 in 19,583 chance..”
“.. As shown in Figure 6 Trump’s reported NC VC of 47.9% is above the upper end of the CI,showing a statistically significant VC discrepancy with his UEP that would be expected to occur by chance only 0.0051% of the time, or less than a 1 in 19,583 chance..”
VOTES WERE CHANGED /7
“A s shown in Figure 7 Trump’s reported FL VC of 49.1% is above the upper end of the CI, showing a statistically significant VC discrepancy with his UEP that would be expected to occur by chance only 0.4468% of the time, or less than a 1 in 224 chance..”
“A s shown in Figure 7 Trump’s reported FL VC of 49.1% is above the upper end of the CI, showing a statistically significant VC discrepancy with his UEP that would be expected to occur by chance only 0.4468% of the time, or less than a 1 in 224 chance..”
VOTES WERE CHANGED /8
Discrepancies Fit Chronic Republican Vote-Count Rigging, not Random Statistical, Patterns
Ron Baiman
researchgate.net/profile/Ron_Ba…
Discrepancies Fit Chronic Republican Vote-Count Rigging, not Random Statistical, Patterns
Ron Baiman
researchgate.net/profile/Ron_Ba…
VOTES WERE CHANGED /9
MSM continues to report polling results to you regarding the forthcoming primaries and the general election. They cannot then reasonably disavow exit polling.
Don’t let them convince you there is no evidence votes were changed.
U.S. 2016 Unadjusted Exit Poll
MSM continues to report polling results to you regarding the forthcoming primaries and the general election. They cannot then reasonably disavow exit polling.
Don’t let them convince you there is no evidence votes were changed.
U.S. 2016 Unadjusted Exit Poll
VOTES WERE CHANGED /10
MSM—“No evidence votes were changed.”
But—No one audited.
You can’t find evidence if you don’t look.
MSM—“No evidence votes were changed.”
But—No one audited.
You can’t find evidence if you don’t look.
